<p>I don't really get the whole fuss over trying to get a 36 and anything lower is bad. I personally got a 29 and I'm taking it again because I was sick last time and didn't even finish the reading because I felt like crap. </p>
<p>But anyways, why is it such a big deal? Yeah you are good at a test but colleges also look at grades and if you are a well rounded person. I talked to a Harvard admission director and they said they would rather have someone with a 32 and do other things such as sports, clubs, ect than someone with a 36/2400 that doesn't do anything because that is common there. </p>
<p>With that being said, I probably still don't have a chance of getting into an ivy, nor do I want to. For me, the ACT is just for scholarship. Where I want to go, the average score is a 24 and if I get a 30+ I am pretty set with a full ride. </p>
<p>What I don't get is why people study their brains out and are not satisfied with being in the top.75% of the country. They want to be the top like.00001%. Just because you get into your "dream school" doesn't mean you will necessarily do well where you could go to a school that isn't quite as hard such as case Western, standard, ect and do a lot better. </p>
<p>Can someone explain their side or idea about this or am I the only one that feels this was?</p>