<p>For the first set was mutualism used twice, commensalism, and altruism?</p>
<p>and ichurki, what increased and decreased?</p>
<p>also, i guessed on the question about the effects of adding an TAT mRNA inhibitor</p>
<p>Yes. I can’t remember the precise order, but I remember mutualism being used twice. Mimicry and parasitism weren’t used.</p>
<p>so the second question - when PCTH decreases…blood calcium…
I was thrown off by the graph compared to what I know about PCTH. I chose “increased” just based off the graph</p>
<p>“I believe the plant one went “photosynthesis, phototaxis, photoperiod, phototropism, photoperiod”. Photorespiration was not used.”
^ thanks Keasbey Nights; that’s would I got.</p>
<p>A decrease in PTH would cause a subsequent decrease in blood calcium.</p>
<p>same ichiruki!
the graph conflicted with my prior knowledge of parathomone or w/e it’s called so i just picked increase :(</p>
<p>I think for the first set it went:
mutualism (bird) - altruism (“more conspicuous”) - commensalism (follow behind an animal) - mutualism (ant)</p>
<p>yea same ichiruki, the graph was done very strangely. The whole time I was thinking that calcitonin decreases the blood calcium levels, but the graph was contradictory. Personally, I think those questions should be thrown out.</p>
<p>guys
i odn’t think the embargo has been lifted
we should stop</p>
<p>Correct, silverlining.</p>
<p>I truly don’t understand how that graph worked. As PTH decreases and then calcium INCREASED in the BLOOD according to the graph. so I chose increase. I am somehow hoping the entire question was wrong and we all get the points lol.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember a question about a piece of phloem (?) turning into a full plant?
And tapeworms?</p>
<p>And once again, you have to read the graph correctly. Calcium levels were on the X-axis (independent variable), while PTH levels were on the Y-axis (dependent variable). Because calcium levels dropped, PTH levels would go up.</p>
<p>Yes silverling93, that’s what I got. </p>
<p>and peacsnapple yes it has “Embargo on June 2009 SAT Discussion lifted.”</p>
<p>wait, the embargo lifted on June 2009 SAT post . Upon further review, it says GCF posted it on 01-24-2009. what is going on? if it’s not lifted, i’ll stop talking about it, but I think we’re all confused.</p>
<p>Fertilizers add inorganic compounds into soil right ??</p>
<p>The body of the post itself was last edited on January 24th, but the title was edited recently. Plus, I’m pretty sure that it was just put up; when I looked this morning, the embargo-lifting post was not stickied.</p>
<p>^Yes. I think it’s same. The month and date are right so it’'s safe I presume.</p>
<p>nss - yes.
could we talk about the theory of modern evolution one?
and Mendel is the father of genetics because…QA experiment?</p>
<p>Mendel is the father because he was the first to quantiatively study genetics, of course.</p>