<p>the most brutal i’ve seen is -1=760… but it didn’t even make sense cuz my friends said that test’s math section wasn’t even that easy.</p>
<p>Anybody remember their answers for the first few MCs in each of the MC only math sections? I still don’t know which math I had was the experimental. Juanita? Round 2020 to 2000?</p>
<p>btw guys, for the temperature problem where you had to see when the actual was below the predicted (or whatever it was), didn’t you just have to count the number of points where one graph was below the other?</p>
<p>and also, what was the other FR with answer 8?</p>
<p>Also: for one of the MC where it asked for r in terms of t (or something like that) did you guys get 3?</p>
<p>for the rectangle problem where the answer was 12 (grid in) does anyone remember what the givens were? (was there a given area)</p>
<p>Bee- the other one was the one that went like p^a^b=p^2c^a</p>
<p>B is 8</p>
<p>So has it been determined that the venn diagram section was the experimental math?</p>
<p>Did anyone get a really easy SAT math question that was just like a 3X3 square (not the grid in one with side 3) and it said to find area? Or something like that? I’m just trying to think of the problems that weren’t experimental and this might have been experimental</p>
<p>I’m so annoyed. I read the question asking how many people are between the 1st and 15th in line wrong, and thought the answer was 14. So now I’m at -2 (that one and the f(x)=f(-3).)</p>
<p>Seriously… of all the ones to get wrong I have to get one of the easiest problems on the test wrong… ugh.</p>
<p>can anyone please tell me if they got 3 for an answer, r in terms of t</p>
<p>also what is the 25% one people are talking about? what was the specific question?</p>
<p>I had these weird last two questions of a 20 question section, that I forgot to do until the last 20 seconds. One of them had two equations, and in the time I got to look at it, the answer choices were like 0, 0 and -3, and -3. It was something about canceling out. The last question was a weird shape with a bunch of lines through it. WAS THIS ONE EXPERIMENTAL?</p>
<p>can someone please tell me what the 25% problem was with answer 500?</p>
<p>Was the triangle question (x = 65) grid in?</p>
<p>@onhceturn</p>
<p>Yes</p>
<p>march sat -1 omit 2 was 740… i hate the curve.</p>
<p>So besides the 25% percent problem with answer 500 that I’ve been asking about for like three days, does anyone remember a problem where it said that 5 numbers added up to something, then you take out three of them, and what does it add up to? Does anyone remember what they put?</p>
<p>(I realize this is getting kind of old now though so it might not be easily remembered)</p>
<p>@Bee for ur second question I think it is 100</p>
<p>ya thats what i thought, and also two more for anyone if they remember:</p>
<ol>
<li><p>what question had answer 603 that I saw someone talking about on a previous page?</p></li>
<li><p>what problem was 1/4x +4 >3? was that on everyone’s test b/c i def. don’t remember that?</p></li>
<li><p>does anyone remember an abs. value problem and what they got for it?</p></li>
</ol>
<p>I have a question about some sequence problem. It was something with the first integer above 100.</p>
<p>78 was the X value to put the degrees over 100 (equaled 158 degrees)</p>
<p>Which was the test looking for?
I was pretty sure the test was looking for the actual X value to put it over 100 degrees, thus making the answer to be, 78.</p>
<p>However, i have heard that they were looking for the next number in sequence after 100.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the exact question/answer?</p>
<p>i remember plugging in 78, however, i believe the question asked for the next number over 100 and it seems to be that this is what most other think as well.</p>