<p>@arrness Im pretty sure the answer was something like “… gives certain media unearned credibility.” All the other answer choices were like “only newspapers make factual statements” and “gossip should only be contained to a written form” something along those lines.</p>
<p>^I agree.</p>
<p>Does anyone know what the answer to that Q was? (The “genuine” one)</p>
<p>@post21398 it was heartfelt. Im 100% sure.</p>
<p>@nolely i agree with the “gives media unearned credibility” question
@post21398
there has been much debate regarding the “genuine” question, but i also believe that the answer should be “heartfelt”, because it fits more with the sentence and also “actual” not only doesn’t make sense, but also it is a more common definition for the word “genuine” than “heartfelt” is and it is more likely than not that voc-in-context questions will test an uncommon definition rather than a common one</p>
<p>dayum Beastmode23, THANKS for crediting me.
i made up not one, but BOTH of the lists you posted up here…</p>
<p>@shyams @nolely we’re definitely talking about a different question… the one with the stringent journalistic standards as an option was referring to only one of the passages (the one that referenced the court case)</p>
<p>I do know what question you are talking about though. it was one of the earlier questions for the passage, the one i am talking about was probably the 2nd or 3rd to last question</p>
<p>What about the math question g(-1)?
And isn’t the max value one something else?</p>
<p>nice job beastmode and noloserhere</p>
<p>for the familiar but undeserved, why coulndt it have been obscured but recognizable?</p>
<p>@noloserhere:
Haha, sorry for not giving you a shoutout here…I was just tired of looking around for a consolidated answers post, so I decided to cut and paste your posts and put them into a new thread. So, here you go:</p>
<p>** COPYRIGHT NOTICE **
All rights to post #1 rightfully belong to noloserhere.</p>
<p>@arrness: The journalism passage (to give context, it was about cybergossip) being discussed was not comparative, you may be referring to a similar, yet experimental, section?</p>
<p>Does anyone remember what
9 (idr the question)
15 (idr the question)</p>
<p>were? Thanks!</p>
<p>@collegebound700 that would explain it</p>
<p>for the stringent journalist standards… which WASNT the answer… was it like for a certain part of the population or community? or was taht a differnt question…? or was it wrong? lol</p>
<p>Say I miss 5 vocab questions but get all of the other comprehension and vocab questions right-- what would my predicted CR score overall be?</p>
<p>Also, for writing. There was some CRAZY question at the improving paragraph section asking what to do with one of the sentences, and the options were like moving it, adjusting a word in it, keeping it the same, or deleting it, and I didn’t think any of the answers were right. Anyone know the answer?</p>
<p>You mean the one about landowners being happy that their houses will be worth more? It is deleting it, because it completely broke up the flow of the paragraph</p>
<p>Can someone please explain why, for the censor passage, it is not harsh but accurate, because author 2 essentially stated the same thing as author 1 (pertaining to censors at least) but in a less aggressive manner.</p>
<p>For the question where there was a sequence of #s and 100 was the first, how many numbers were bigger than 2?</p>
<p>@HoCru56, because the 2nd author said that censorship is more complex than just “evil”, and that a form of censorship in selection is actually effective</p>
<p>@happysmileyface, I don’t remember that question, I remember one where there were two sequences and you had to say which was was in one sequence but not the other, is that what you’re talking about?</p>