Justifying a degree in music

<p>Hi everyone, I was wondering whether you can help me think of how to reply to these opinions. I’m trying to justify my decision to go into music to a certain person, and I’d really appreciate your thoughts regarding the following arguments.</p>

<ol>
<li><p>When athletes go to a college or university, they pour their energy primarily into training and perfecting their skills in their sport, and spend most of their time in practices and games. They will probably spend more time doing sports than studying, and after they graduate, they might make their living solely off of sports. Yet they still graduate with a degree in an academic field from that college/university. Why do musicians pursue a degree in music? That’s like an athlete pursuing a degree in football, or a gymnast pursuing a degree in gymnastics, or a swimmer getting a degree in swimming. You can do music along the side, and even potentially have a career in music, but why waste your time, money, and brain in college to just graduate with a useless music degree you don’t need? </p></li>
<li><p>Going along with the first point: since playing music is so physical, and involves exertion and use of the body, how is it any different from any sport? You’re using your fingers and exercising them every day while practicing, just like athletes. You are preparing for performances—just like athletes for games. Musicians get injured sometimes, just like athletes. The only difference is that people pay to watch athletes in a game, and even if you paid people nowadays to attend a classical music concert they wouldn’t go. At least there is a demand for sports entertainment in the modern world-- athletes are in a way smarter than musicians because they know what people want and will pay for, and that’s what they pursue.</p></li>
</ol>

<p>I brought up writers and poets and other types of artists (who get degrees in writing and art), but she said those people are actually using their brains in the process, and producing original, creative work. Which leads to another point…</p>

<ol>
<li><p>Composers are the only smart people in the music world. Many composers (Bach, Beethoven, Bernstein, etc.) were geniuses and they used their mental capabilities to create works of music. A performer is a derivative, lower form of musician who basically takes pre-written music and plays it. There are thousands of musicians in the world—many prodigies-- that are way better than you and can perform the pieces much better. Why does the world need another performer—why would anyone listen to you when they could listen to hundreds of top-notch performers that are better than you?</p></li>
<li><p>Music is the lowest form of career in the professional world. Scientists, doctors, lawyers, teachers, accountants...all these people use their brains—they study, do research, have successful jobs, support their families. No one who is smart will go off and solely study music. Out of all the people in a typical high school orchestra, all the smart ones go off to college to get academic degrees. Only those who are inadequate academically, who are only good at playing their instrument, go on to pursue music. </p></li>
</ol>

<p>Sorry if any of that was offensive (trust me, as a musician I am highly offended myself) but I would really appreciate any thoughts. Thanks.</p>

<p>Studying music involves music history, theory, composition, technology, ethonomusicology as well as performance. Some theory classes are harder than premed science, I have heard. Focus on performance has nothing to do with whether a person has skill in academics or not, of course. It’s a choice made by people who are passionate about music.</p>

<p>Some musicians do major in other things, get a BA, and study privately while attending university. They manage to fit in the many hours of practice required to develop. That is also a personal choice.</p>

<p>A degree in music is like a bachelor’s in anything else and opens doors to many jobs, in music and not in music, that require a bachelor’s, as well as to professional and graduate schools, including medical, law and business schools.</p>

<p>I have quoted this many times and no longer remember the source or the year, but a few years back I read that as a group, music majors have the highest rate of acceptance to medical school at 66 % (at the time). The discipline, focus and dedication of musicians is respected everywhere.</p>

<p>At the undergraduate level, what makes more sense than pursuing what you love? These days, it isn’t just about getting an orchestra seat. There are many ways to make music, and many musicians are thriving through entrepreneurial efforts, whether or not they also have a “day job.”</p>

<p>This topic comes up a lot, so you might also want to do a search.</p>

<p>Cerebellum,
I am sorry that you are hearing all these “negatives” about pursuing music.<br>
I thought I would address each point individually:
1: You are write that the pursuit of music is a lot like the pursuit of sports. Why do colleges, even those who are division 3 value athletes when doing admissions? Not all schools make a ton of money from their sports teams. They value them because there is a correspondence between athletic success and leadership. One could argue that musicians are similar. They are involved in a team activity and through doing music they have learned cooperation, leadership and discipline.</p>

<p>Music requires more “academic study” then most people realize. Sure you can do music on the side while pursuing another academic degree, but as the above poster said it is important to eventually learn the music theory, history, technology, composition and ethnomusicology if you want to push the limits of what music can do. </p>

<p>Most successful musicians are not just “meat with instruments”. To be a good musician you can not just imitate music. You need to be able to use your instrument as a tool for expression. Today technical proficiency will not get you very far. Why? Because we have synthesizers and other ways of making music that is perfect. When people go to hear an orchestra live they want to hear the “human element”. Even a technical composer like Philip Glass uses real musicians. </p>

<p>As for the person who insists that musicians are not using their brains as much as a writer or a poet, they speaking from a place of ignorance. Google MRI and musicians and you will see that musician’s brains are doing AMAZING things while they are playing music. Some might argue that musicians are engaging more of their brains than other artists.</p>

<p>Why become a performer if you are not a prodigy? One could apply that to almost any field and easily become pretty depressed. Why do anything? Why go into science if you are not going to win a Nobel Prize or make a great discovery? Why spend 2 decades of your life to become a doctor if all you are going to do is diagnosis ear infections in children and prescribe antibiotics? Why become a lawyer when there are no jobs available for lawyers? Why study history? Why write a book, if that book might never get published. </p>

<p>I would turn this around and ask that person what do most people who graduate from college do with their lives and how is that useful to society? Does the world need another banker or wall-street executive to screw over the masses? Do we need more politicians? Do we need people to invent better weapons? pharmaceuticals that do more harm than good? The world needs musicians and it needs music teachers. Making music is what we do as humans and it is a valuable skill. Several weeks ago my son had a classmate who was hospitalized. He asked his friends to visit him and bring their instruments. They did and the response to their music from the care providers and the other patients was amazing. Research is showing that live music has a profound effect on the brain. After the Boston Marathon bombings several students from my son’s conservatory (btw, Berklee took credit for this but the students were from NEC) went to one of the hospitals and played outside. It helped relax so many who were tense and upset. Music can change lives and it has the ability to have a profound effect on any individual. It is pretty cool to be somebody who has that power. </p>

<p>How you choose to use music after you graduate will depend a lot on your creativity and your drive? There are plenty of ways to make a living as a professional musician if that is your goal. And because music is helping you develop your own brain if you decide that you do not want to pursue music you will likely that you have the discipline to learn or study anything you want. As the above poster said it is not unusual for a musician to decide to go to medical school or do something else. One of the main team members that helped land the current Mars Rover Curiosity on Mars originally went to music school. Brian May of the band Queen is now a professor of Cosmology in a London University. And I recently went to a lecture given by another cosmologist who is also another ex-musician.</p>

<p>Actually, I had worried just likes Cellabellum for a long time.
Thank you for clear explanation, StacJip!</p>

<p>Judging by some of those arguments, I think you are dealing a person who is never going to understand you. I love the logic presented in #2. Following the reasoning that athletes are smarter because they’ve figured out what people are willing to pay for makes prostitutes geniuses. </p>

<p>Giving a kid expensive lessons and instilling in them the value of hard work and discipline is playing with fire. If parents keep doing this with the idea that it will improve their kid’s ACT scores and keep them out of trouble by using up all their free time, once in a while a kid with real talent and passion is going to appear and it will be the parents’ fault. You can’t blame the kid for having your DNA and worth ethic. And by the way, if you are a future Owl, I think the “do I have talent” question has been answered definitively. </p>

<p>You might just be dealing with one person trying to control another and if that’s the case, good luck. Is getting into Rice really not good enough ? That’s a discouraging thought.</p>

<p>^Great responses posted above! An education in music is never “wasted”. I never worry that those who choose music as their majors will have a problem figuring it out eventually because they have explored their creativity, and have the ability to think outside the box. We need more people like this in the world, and they should be celebrated. I would encourage those who go into music and end up not making it their career to view that the problem does not lie in their talent or capabilities, but rather on the society that doesn’t appreciate the value of what musicians do. Case in point-the arguments that the Cerabellum is trying to explain. The attitude displayed above tells me more about the person who is questioning the reason to get a musical degree-not Cerabellum. And unfortunately, it’s a typical response from someone who will never “get it”.</p>

<p>It’s that time of year again, when one of my favorite “sporting events” is to scan the local paper to see the top of the class seniors, where they list their extra curricular activities. The number of scholars who participate in the fine arts far outnumber the students who were involved in sports, year after year. Not that there is anything wrong with sports, but quite frankly, it takes a lot more intelligence to appreciate a classical music concert than it does to appreciate a game. Enough said, rant over!</p>

<p>Cerabellum, did you realize there is nearly 100% placement rate for Music Education jobs out of college? You have to take enough education coursework to be certified to teach in a public school system, and you also get a complete music degree with performance opportunities. Of course, you also have to have the talent and interest for teaching youth. </p>

<p>As ProMusician pointed out, there is a strong correlation between academic high achievers in high school, and participation in music. This is because of the discipline, focus, and actual cognitive development that intensive music participation builds in a student. Many parents know this, and start their kids in music at a young age, even if they have no intention of pursuing a career in music, but because it is such good “cross training” for traditional academic courses. </p>

<p>It is also a great extra curricular activity to provide a constructive diversion from other less-savory activities, as can be seen in the story on NBC News last week about the Boston area high school. They transferred their security budget to the music/arts program, and turned around the school.</p>

<p>For these reasons there will always be a need for Music Education in K-12.</p>

<p>Some people simply want to be musicians, or artists, or writers, and they should be allowed to pursue their strong interest. yet I hear many parents such as the person cerebellum describes. One such person is the husband of an accompanist I know well. He even says such things (“musicians are worthless”) to his (soon to be ex-) wife! Yet he hates his desk job, and is a verbally abusive person, both to his wife and his daughters.</p>

<p>My oldest daughter, age 25, is a professional artist/painter. Many people think studying art is a waste of time too. Fortunately she did not listen to those people. Most of her high school classmates are still looking for work in this bad job climate. Meanwhile, she has been earning over $100,000 a year in sales. And she is no “dumb” artist. She reads history and the classics constantly, and listens to classical music while she paints.</p>

<p>If you go into the arts, go in smart. Don’t go into debt, have a plan, a vision, and work like crazy. People who do that can do almost anything.</p>

<p>You will never justify pursuing music to someone who simply does not appreciate music or musicians.</p>

<p>Don’t waste your breath.</p>

<p>Even if this person is a parent, remember that you should never try to draw water from an empty well.</p>

<p>I would say the person who said those things doesn’t know their head from their tail, and has zero exposure to what music is or isn’t, and also values only one thing in her life, material success, as a criteria for ‘the good life’. First of all, she assumes that people who make high salaries are creative, yet a lot of doctors are not all that creative or smart, they have gone through the process of becoming a doctor, but most are run of the mill practioners. The really bright ones become the ones who innovate and create, the DeBakeys and the like, the top flight surgeons and such, but they are rare; and the really creative ones go into medical research, which actually doesn’t pay that well. Likewise, while there are brilliant professors out there, who create amazing things, a lot of them are run of the mill, too, despite their credentials…and professors don’t make great salaries, most of them could do much better in the private sector. </p>

<p>Sure, if your idea in life is to make high 6 figure salary and drive a Benz, then music may not be the place for you, because it is a hard living or can be. But then again, if you want to make that kind of money, become a drug dealer, lot of them drive high price cars and such. If money is her only idea of success, she really needs to look at what she is saying, because as i pointed out above, a lot of creative, innovative people are not well paid. </p>

<p>As far as musicians not being creative people or intelligent, I would tell her that as an employer, the people who often are the most creative are often people like musicans who have forged their own paths. They are used to working hard, and unlike the cutthroat nature of becoming a doctor or investment banker, they have learned inherently in how to work with other people, working in ensembles, or putting together groups, requires a lot of skills, and when they attempt to make it in music, they have to hustle, they have to use connections and they have to work through things that are nebulous at best, create new opportunities and so forth…and it shows when they are hired.</p>

<p>Want to know something? The kids who game the system, who get the 2300+ on the SAT, get the great grades, have gotten into the right schools, gotten great grades, often turn out to be terrible employees. Why? Because all they know is how to game the system, they worked and studies hard, but they followed a formula. Getting a great grade in a class is not the same thing as actually learning to think, figuring out the system to get into the great schools (like, for example, playing music simply as a great EC) works through that world, but then you get out into the world and have to figure out a whole new paradigm. School is not the real world, and musicians, even in school, are dealing with a very different world then getting a 4.0 and so forth, it is very different…and it shows in the working world. </p>

<p>To be creative and innovative, to really achieve something, someone has to be willing to go beyond the norm, whether it is researchers, engineers, scientists or artists and they have to be willing to challenge conventional wisdom, which is something God help them, musicians are doing:). BTW, studies of musicians have shown that on the creativity and intelligence scales, they tend to be pretty well off to the right…ask her if she ever heard Perlman, Yo Yo Ma or a conductor like Dudamel speaking, and then listen to your typical corporate spokesman or politician, and tell me who is the brighter person…</p>

<p>My overall take is if the kid has the gumption to attempt to go into music, really make a go at it, and has the encouragement and backing of their parents, they will make it whether or not they actually end up in music. 50% of those who graduate from a place like Juilliard are out of music within a short span after graduating, and within 10 years a lot of them are no longer directly in music…but most of them end up finding careers and vocations outside music. Allan Greenspan, the former chairman of the fed, was a Jazz musician before he went back and got his degree in economics, there are a ton of doctors, computer people (ton of ex musicians or recreational musicians in that), in business and so forth. The key thing to remember is most college degrees don’t really prepare you directly for the working world, even tech degrees and the like generally leave someone where they have to learn a lot to be useful, so a music student with a degree isn’t going to be different than an english major, a history major, or even a business admin major when it comes to the work world, and they have skills those other kids probably won’t have. </p>

<p>As far as not being good enough, look at all those prodigies out there, why bother? Tell you a little secret, 99% of the child prodigies eventually burn out, a lot in their teens, most after high school, because whatever it was that drove them as kids is played out (that, and also that most of the time they have been pushed by parents too hard). The hotshots, the ones who are held in esteem by teachers and these great gods, often end up crashing and burning because they all think they are going to be the great soloist, that is all there is, and there are maybe a dozen or so people in the world routinely doing that on violin and piano, for example (maybe a bit more…), and they burn, because they never learn to play with others, they never learn the skills needed, and they end up in obscurity, whereas the kids who aren’t quite as good, who aren’t the soloist type, end up in ensembles and orchestras and doing a variety of things, because they have the ability and the skills. </p>

<p>One of the things that scares me about modern times is this obsession these days that everything has to be practical, that college is about job training, that unless it leads to that ‘great job’ it doesn’t matter. It is the same way the beancounters in industry have killed off basic research, arguing ‘it isn’t worth it’, it is the same way that parents are telling kids it is not okay to dream or reach for a dream, that all that matters is real life. It is nothing new, of course, read the book “The Rocket Boys” about a boy from a West Virginia coal town who gets fascinated by rockets after sputnik and with a group of boys starts experimenting with rockets, and ends up working for Nasa as an engineer and his friends and he all got into college on scholarships, unheard of in those parts. The boys father (I think the movie was called “October Sky”) tells him to stop fooling around and go to work and be a man, and almost succeeds.</p>

<p>I think if you want to go into music, you have to have the passion and face the fact that it is not something easy to do, or likely to easily give a good living, but you also should kn ow that plenty of musicians try, fail, end up doing other things, often successfully, but still are enriched by doing music. I think the real answer is you have to justify it to yourself., not to the other person. I realize if this is a parent it can be a battle, and that it may be impossible to do it without their support, and I wish I had easy answers. I suspect if she is set enough in her mind about it, you may not be able to dissuade her. I see that a lot, there are a lot of kids I have seen who love music, who are fantastic musicians, who end up doing things they don’t want to do because their parents think music is only good to get you into a top notch school or something. The only comfort I offer is when at college, if they insist you do academics, you can still study privately, join the school orchestra, and if you decide not to become a doctor or investment banker, you could then attempt to break off and go to grad school for music, since you wouldn’t have to rely on them.</p>

<p>There are no guarantees in any field, especially today when lawyers can’t find jobs and med students can’t always secure residencies. It’s a crazy world and the rules are constantly changing. My husband has had to reinvent himself three times in the last twenty years (not necessarily a good thing, but at least he’s working). If you love music, then go for it. I tell my son he can always pick up a degree online at some later date if he needs to. You will always be a musician. Who knows? Maybe the El Sistema movement will catch on in a big way and our public schools will begin to embrace it. I do think classical music is due for a resurgence.</p>

<p>Wow. I didn’t expect so many responses-- thank you for all the very helpful and informative posts. Yes, the arguments I stated in my OP were from a parent (I think some people thought they were my opinions–definitely not true). I thought she had changed her mind over the course of my auditions this year, but apparently not. I don’t think she ever will, and I’m not going to try to convince her any longer. </p>

<p>I’m going for a BM in performance, and she says unless I absolutely have to get another degree in an academic field at the same time, or else she will not support me. I don’t mind double majoring actually-- I enjoy studying and I want to keep up my academics especially as Rice is such a great university-- it’s just her views on music and musicians that bother me. Strange since she was the one who started my siblings and I on music and supported us continually through high school.</p>

<p>Is she not aware of the level of achievement it is to get accepted into Rice? Does she know how few they accept every year? Maybe that would help. I had a couple friends he were so called “prodigies” who chose Rice over Curtis and Juilliard. Her argument about so many musicians being better than you is silly. Congratulations on getting accepted! Don’t let her take that joy away from you :)</p>

<p>Cerebellum, I love your spunk, and I am sure you will be successful in whatever path you choose. I hope your parents come around to see where your true passions lie, but at the same time, you seem to recognize their limitations, as well as their power to help fund your undergrad degree. You sound very mature in my opinion. </p>

<p>My advice is to do that first year in Rice as well as you can … assume you must get strong grades as a pre-med or whatever major you and your parents negotiate, but try to keep your music going as your extra curricular activity or even as a class that counts toward your chosen major’s electives. </p>

<p>I will add that my D is one who started out trying to please her parents as she chose her school and major (pre-med/biochemistry as a freshman at large school in Northeast). She had the grades and academics, and she always assumed she would grow up to be an OB/GYN since she was 5 and realized that was a job her friend’s parent had. She received a nice merit award for the pre-med path and her one music school audition was a yes, but w/o scholarship, so she listened to what she heard one of us say once during the fall (H said he would pay big $'s for a pre-med, but would not be inclined to pay big buck for music degree). </p>

<p>She was a very talented musician in HS and even through her freshman year in college (sings/plays piano/writes/arranges/performs solo acts, etc). Since she wasn’t majoring in music, she poured her music energy her freshman year into a cappella groups and really had fun, but by the end of freshman year realized that she was on the wrong path. She would meet people who were actually majoring in music and felt like they were living her life. She almost didn’t tell us how wrong she felt about her path, fearing that we wouldn’t support her, but in the end she told us and we realized how strongly she felt about it and from there on out she changed her direction / her school / her major / and her outlook on her future. (And the 2nd audition at the same music school did yield a nice scholarship, which sealedthe deal for H.)</p>

<p>By the end of this year she’ll have an official music degree, and she’ll have to become an entrepreneur for herself and for the talent and skills she is offering the world, but she knows that and is committed to doing that. </p>

<p>As parents, we are nervous, as her future is not as clear as ours was at the same age (engineers, both parents). However, in the end, we and most parents want their kids to be happy and fulfilled, and able to pay basic bills. Your parents also want the best for you, and for now, all they can see clearly is that nearly any major but music is better for you. They are generally right that the stats are against a music performance major from being well off after undergrad; in fact, unless you have other skills as a musician, being only a music performance major could limit your paid job options. They aren’t trying to be mean or non-supportive, because they are going off of real statistics and knowledge, and they may not understand all the paths a musician can take to make money. Heed their advice this year, pursue developing your music self, and re-assess your direction each semester until you are satisfied with your path. Good luck.</p>

<p>Cerra- You CAN do this even without the support of your mom. You can get loans in your own name and you can get a job or jobs to bring in money. Please be careful not to exhaust yourself with trying to justify your career choice to anyone though- it will just weigh on you and bring you down. My D had this problem with her father and it has caused an irreparable rift between the two of them. She long ago gave up on the idea of trying to make him understand her or accept what she wanted to do in life because he will never get it. I hope that you and your family can “agree to disagree” on this and keep the lines of communication open.
You’ve done very well this year- wishing you the best of everything in the future!</p>

<p>Well, we can’t ALL be accountants…</p>

<p>I just came across this and thought appropriate to add to this thread:</p>

<p>Karl Paulnack’s Welcome Address that he gave at Boston Consevartory a number of year’s ago. It sums up so perfectly the task set before musicians.</p>

<p>“One of my parents’ deepest fears, I suspect, is that society would not properly value me as a musician, that I wouldn’t be appreciated. I had very good grades in high school, I was good in science and math, and they imagined that as a doctor or a research chemist or an engineer, I might be more appreciated than I would be as a musician. I still remember my mother’s remark when I announced my decision to apply to music school—she said, “you’re wasting your SAT scores!” On some level, I think, my parents were not sure themselves what the value of music was, what its purpose was. And they loved music: they listened to classical music all the time. They just weren’t really clear about its function. So let me talk about that a little bit, because we live in a society that puts music in the “arts and entertainment” section of the newspaper, and serious music, the kind your kids are about to engage in, has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with entertainment, in fact it’s the opposite of entertainment. Let me talk a little bit about music, and how it works.</p>

<p>One of the first cultures to articulate how music really works were the ancient Greeks. And this is going to fascinate you: the Greeks said that music and astronomy were two sides of the same coin. Astronomy was seen as the study of relationships between observable, permanent, external objects, and music was seen as the study of relationships between invisible, internal, hidden objects. Music has a way of finding the big, invisible moving pieces inside our hearts and souls and helping us figure out the position of things inside us. Let me give you some examples of how this works.
One of the most profound musical compositions of all time is the Quartet for the End of Time written by French composer Olivier Messiaen in 1940. Messiaen was 31 years old when France entered the war against Nazi Germany. He was captured by the Germans in June of 1940 and imprisoned in a prisoner-of-war camp.</p>

<p>He was fortunate to find a sympathetic prison guard who gave him paper and a place to compose, and fortunate to have musician colleagues in the camp, a cellist, a violinist, and a clarinetist. Messiaen wrote his quartet with these specific players in mind. It was performed in January 1941 for four thousand prisoners and guards in the prison camp. Today it is one of the most famous masterworks in the repertoire.</p>

<p>Given what we have since learned about life in the Nazi camps, why would anyone in his right mind waste time and energy writing or playing music? There was barely enough energy on a good day to find food and water, to avoid a beating, to stay warm, to escape torture—why would anyone bother with music? And yet—even from the concentration camps, we have poetry, we have music, we have visual art; it wasn’t just this one fanatic Messiaen; many, many people created art. Why? Well, in a place where people are only focused on survival, on the bare necessities, the obvious conclusion is that art must be, somehow, essential for life. The camps were without money, without hope, without commerce, without recreation, without basic respect, but they were not without art. Art is part of survival; art is part of the human spirit, an unquenchable expression of who we are. Art is one of the ways in which we say, “I am alive, and my life has meaning.”</p>

<p>In September of 2001 I was a resident of Manhattan. On the morning of September 12, 2001 I reached a new understanding of my art and its relationship to the world. I sat down at the piano that morning at 10 AM to practice as was my daily routine; I did it by force of habit, without thinking about it. I lifted the cover on the keyboard, and opened my music, and put my hands on the keys and took my hands off the keys. And I sat there and thought, does this even matter? Isn’t this completely irrelevant? Playing the piano right now, given what happened in this city yesterday, seems silly, absurd, irreverent, pointless. Why am I here? What place has a musician in this moment in time? Who needs a piano player right now? I was completely lost.</p>

<p>And then I, along with the rest of New York, went through the journey of getting through that week. I did not play the piano that day, and in fact I contemplated briefly whether I would ever want to play the piano again. And then I observed how we got through the day.</p>

<p>At least in my neighborhood, we didn’t shoot hoops or play Scrabble. We didn’t play cards to pass the time, we didn’t watch TV, we didn’t shop, we most certainly did not go to the mall. The first organized activity that I saw in New York, on the very evening of September 11th, was singing. People sang. People sang around fire houses, people sang “We Shall Overcome”. Lots of people sang America the Beautiful. The first organized public event that I remember was the Brahms Requiem, later that week, at Lincoln Center, with the New York Philharmonic. The first organized public expression of grief, our first communal response to that historic event, was a concert. That was the beginning of a sense that life might go on. The US Military secured the airspace, but recovery was led by the arts, and by music in particular, that very night.</p>

<p>From these two experiences, I have come to understand that music is not part of “arts and entertainment” as the newspaper section would have us believe. It’s not a luxury, a lavish thing that we fund from leftovers of our budgets, not a plaything or an amusement or a pass time. Music is a basic need of human survival. Music is one of the ways we make sense of our lives, one of the ways in which we express feelings when we have no words, a way for us to understand things with our hearts when we can’t with our minds.
Some of you may know Samuel Barber’s heart wrenchingly beautiful piece Adagio for Strings. If you don’t know it by that name, then some of you may know it as the background music which accompanied the Oliver Stone movie Platoon, a film about the Vietnam War. If you know that piece of music either way, you know it has the ability to crack your heart open like a walnut; it can make you cry over sadness you didn’t know you had. Music can slip beneath our conscious reality to get at what’s really going on inside us the way a good therapist does.</p>

<p>Very few of you have ever been to a wedding where there was absolutely no music. There might have been only a little music, there might have been some really bad music, but with few exceptions there is some music. And something very predictable happens at weddings—people get all pent up with all kinds of emotions, and then there’s some musical moment where the action of the wedding stops and someone sings or plays the flute or something. And even if the music is lame, even if the quality isn’t good, predictably 30 or 40 percent of the people who are going to cry at a wedding cry a couple of moments after the music starts. Why? The Greeks. Music allows us to move around those big invisible pieces of ourselves and rearrange our insides so that we can express what we feel even when we can’t talk about it. Can you imagine watching Indiana Jones or Superman or Star Wars with the dialogue but no music? What is it about the music swelling up at just the right moment in ET so that all the softies in the audience start crying at exactly the same moment? I guarantee you if you showed the movie with the music stripped out, it wouldn’t happen that way. The Greeks. Music is the understanding of the relationship between invisible internal objects.</p>

<p>I’ll give you one more example, the story of the most important concert of my life. I must tell you I have played a little less than a thousand concerts in my life so far. I have played in places that I thought were important. I like playing in Carnegie Hall; I enjoyed playing in Paris; it made me very happy to please the critics in St. Petersburg. I have played for people I thought were important; music critics of major newspapers, foreign heads of state. The most important concert of my entire life took place in a nursing home in a small Midwestern town a few years ago.</p>

<p>I was playing with a very dear friend of mine who is a violinist. We began, as we often do, with Aaron Copland’s Sonata, which was written during World War II and dedicated to a young friend of Copland’s, a young pilot who was shot down during the war. Now we often talk to our audiences about the pieces we are going to play rather than providing them with written program notes. But in this case, because we began the concert with this piece, we decided to talk about the piece later in the program and to just come out and play the music without explanation.</p>

<p>Midway through the piece, an elderly man seated in a wheelchair near the front of the concert hall began to weep. This man, whom I later met, was clearly a soldier—even in his 70′s, it was clear from his buzz-cut hair, square jaw and general demeanor that he had spent a good deal of his life in the military. I thought it a little bit odd that someone would be moved to tears by that particular movement of that particular piece, but it wasn’t the first time I’ve heard crying in a concert and we went on with the concert and finished the piece.</p>

<p>When we came out to play the next piece on the program, we decided to talk about both the first and second pieces, and we described the circumstances in which the Copland was written and mentioned its dedication to a downed pilot. The man in the front of the audience became so disturbed that he had to leave the auditorium. I honestly figured that we would not see him again, but he did come backstage afterwards, tears and all, to explain himself.</p>

<p>What he told us was this: “During World War II, I was a pilot, and I was in an aerial combat situation where one of my team’s planes was hit. I watched my friend bail out, and watched his parachute open, but the Japanese planes which had engaged us returned and machine gunned across the parachute cords so as to separate the parachute from the pilot, and I watched my friend drop away into the ocean, realizing that he was lost. I have not thought about this for many years, but during that first piece of music you played, this memory returned to me so vividly that it was as though I was reliving it. I didn’t understand why this was happening, why now, but then when you came out to explain that this piece of music was written to commemorate a lost pilot, it was a little more than I could handle. How does the music do that? How did it find those feelings and those memories in me?”</p>

<p>Remember the Greeks: music is the study of invisible relationships between internal objects. The concert in the nursing home was the most important work I have ever done. For me to play for this old soldier and help him connect, somehow, with Aaron Copland, and to connect their memories of their lost friends, to help him remember and mourn his friend, this is my work. This is why music matters.</p>

<p>What follows is part of the talk I will give to this year’s freshman class when I welcome them a few days from now. The responsibility I will charge your sons and daughters with is this:</p>

<p>“If we were a medical school, and you were here as a med student practicing appendectomies, you’d take your work very seriously because you would imagine that some night at two AM someone is going to waltz into your emergency room and you’re going to have to save their life. Well, my friends, someday at 8 PM someone is going to walk into your concert hall and bring you a mind that is confused, a heart that is overwhelmed, a soul that is weary. Whether they go out whole again will depend partly on how well you do your craft.</p>

<p>You’re not here to become an entertainer, and you don’t have to sell yourself. The truth is you don’t have anything to sell; being a musician isn’t about dispensing a product, like selling used cars. I’m not an entertainer; I’m a lot closer to a paramedic, a firefighter, a rescue worker. You’re here to become a sort of therapist for the human soul, a spiritual version of a chiropractor, physical therapist, someone who works with our insides to see if they get things to line up, to see if we can come into harmony with ourselves and be healthy and happy and well.</p>

<p>Frankly, ladies and gentlemen, I expect you not only to master music; I expect you to save the planet. If there is a future wave of wellness on this planet, of harmony, of peace, of an end to war, of mutual understanding, of equality, of fairness, I don’t expect it will come from a government, a military force or a corporation. I no longer even expect it to come from the religions of the world, which together seem to have brought us as much war as they have peace. If there is a future of peace for humankind, if there is to be an understanding of how these invisible, internal things should fit together, I expect it will come from the artists, because that’s what we do. As in the concentration camp and the evening of 9/11, the artists are the ones who might be able to help us with our internal, invisible lives.”</p>

<p>That is beautiful. I think I will have to send that to my daughter.</p>

<p>CB-</p>

<p>It isn’t so weird that your parent had you guys playing music, all you have to do is pick up a copy of the infamous Tiger Mom book to understand it, it is the idea that music isn’t important in itself, but rather what it represents to others, specifically to the admissions departments of top notch schools. Basically music is something they believe will impress the schools, so it is a means to an end, not an end in of itself (and from personal experience, few of these parents know much about classical music, they don’t listen to it or really care about it). Put it this way, a lot of the kids in music programs before college, whether it is pre college programs, youth orchestras and the like, even if they wanted to go into music would not be allowed to by their parents, so what you are experiencing is sadly the norm (and IMO they are not entirely wrong, to differentiate yourself from other applicants with similar stats, having music at a high level on your CV does seem to help, the top schools love to build their orchestras and such). </p>

<p>There is nothing wrong with dual majoring, though from what I have read on here and heard they don’t exactly encourage dual majoring like that at Rice…but as they say, if that is the only way you can do music, go for it. Your other option might be a program like Colburn, that is full ride, but it can be a very, very difficult admit, and is a relatively small and newer conservatory, so it might not fit what you are looking for, but it would allow you to be independent and do music only if that is your wish.</p>

<p>Well said, musicprnt.</p>