Lunacy at Barnard

<p>This article in the Columbia Spectator was written by a Barnard senior, the sister of a new midshipman at the USNA. Aside from the poor writing and stupidity in the article, my heart goes out to this young man that his sister could be so self-centered as to use him as the basis of her attack on the military. She was actually shocked to find out that Annapolis is part of the military.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.columbiaspectator.com/node/26470%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.columbiaspectator.com/node/26470&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>Words escape me......</p>

<p>A similar thread is also going on now at the USNA forum site. If you click that link above, be sure to scroll down and read some of the replies coming in.</p>

<p>By the way - if you're so inclined, please post comments at the Spectator - there's a section underneath the article where you can post your thoughts. My respect for Columbia (and whatever I might have had for Barnard) is now in the negative range.</p>

<p>I would hire an Academy grad over a Barnard grad any day of the week. </p>

<p>What I can't believe she would use her brother like this to "sell" her political point of view. What arrogance.</p>

<p>Great...the Spectator site is down today for maintenance so I can't read it. Is there anywhere else I could find the article?</p>

<p>Here's the article - maybe the site is down because Columbia is ashamed of having published this. This was the lead story on the homepage of their online newspaper.</p>

<p>The Truth About the Academies
By Idris Leppla
PUBLISHED SEPTEMBER 7, 2007</p>

<p>The following is the first part of a four-part series. The author wishes to express that this article in no way reflects the feelings and thoughts of her brother. It is written from a family member’s perspective and is mean to be understood in that way.</p>

<p>I know why I chose Columbia: the campus is magnificent, the education is top-tier, and my peers are intelligent. I could look at a stranger, tell him or her that I went to Columbia, and hear the predictable, “Wow, you must be smart.”</p>

<p>When my brother was getting ready to go to the Naval Academy, everyone ooohed and awed about how brave he was. Aunts and uncles would say, “John, you must be one of thousands of kids who wanted to go—you must be so smart!” When he appeared unsure about whether he wanted to choose Navy or University of California, Berkeley, one uncle who works on Wall Street said, “John, businessmen love hiring people from the academies. You will be set for life.” With that kind of promised prestige, my brother found it tough to give up a spot at Navy. So in June, my family dropped him off in Annapolis.</p>

<p>Before he left, my family had countless talks about what it might mean to be at an academy. While we knew that someday he would be required to serve, we also were drawn to the top-tier education he was promised to receive. We were told that the Naval Academy was first and foremost an elite college. He would be able to learn history, economics, political science, and even engineering. He would play lacrosse on a nationally ranked team and play the bugle in the marching band. He would have seminars about leadership and selflessness. He would even go to school for free.</p>

<p>When I talked to my brother about why he wanted to go, he admitted that it was because he was drawn to the structure of the place—as a kid who did not want to sit around and drink beer during college, he liked the fact that he would be busy and have a purpose. I soon became comfortable with the idea of the academy, as if it would be a haven for my brother’s undergraduate career. And when people would congratulate me on my brother’s decision, it made me feel reassured.</p>

<p>Soon that pride turned to anger and fear: after my mom dropped him off at Annapolis, she came home with an acute sense of grief. The only thing she could talk about was how to get him out. In addition to missing his presence at home, she was scared by the extent to which her son had suddenly become the property of the U.S. Navy.</p>

<p>She begged me to call a naval lieutenant Monday morning to start the out-processing forms for my brother. After leaving countless messages for the lieutenant, he finally called me back, at which point he informed me that my brother would have to go through 13 exit-interviews to be dismissed, including an interview with the head of the Navy. When I asked him whether this might intimidate him out of leaving, the lieutenant reminded me that my brother had signed an oath legally binding him to the Navy. When I reminded the lieutenant that he had signed that oath after he had been yelled at all day and that his hair had just been shaven off during his first day there, he comforted me that John was not at all forced to sign the oath.</p>

<p>When I looked at the course catalogue, which boasted seminars about leadership and selflessness, they were in fact seminars about weaponry and leading troops into combat. The reality of sending my brother to the Naval Academy began to set in: this was not a school; this was the military. While they boast a first class education, the main goal of this institution was to get my brother “combat ready.” During the first two “induction days,” the head of the Navy openly admitted that their goal was to transform these boys into men who would willingly die defending our country. They said to my parents, “We will manage to do in 18 minutes what you could not do in 18 years—we will discipline your boys and have them calling you Sir and Ma’am.” When they talked of courage and bravery, they showed a video of a Navy marine rounding off an unlimited supply of ammunition. During my brother’s plebe summer (his first summer), he could not talk to us for more than a few minutes once a week for fear that we might unduly influence him.</p>

<p>My brother ended up liking Annapolis and he has decided to stay. While it has been difficult for me to accept that I have a brother in the military, I must allow him to pursue whatever path he is drawn toward, and he has admitted to me that he feels called to being there. However, for anyone else out there considering a career in the academy, let it be known: the U.S. Naval Academy is not an elite college; it is first and foremost a branch of the U.S. military and the prestige comes at a big price—it taxes parents, siblings, and participants if they do not understand what they were signing up for.</p>

<p>Thanks BigGreen. It did cross my mind that the site might be down so they can remove the article.</p>

<p>What an ignoramus! Glad to see her brother is 100 times smarter than she is.</p>

<h2>Well. I would expect that the son did his research before he pursued the Naval Academy. And based on the comments by his (I am sure) well-meaning Sister and Mother, he's probably relieved to be responsible for himself and making his own decisions.</h2>

<p>If he stays and graduates, he will thrive in a way he would not otherwise have been able. And if he does not stay, he still will be able to educate others on the importance of the Academy's mission (ALL 5 of the academies).</p>

<p>Damn; And to think that I spent 21 years in the military defending her right to "SAY THAT CRAP". Go figure. later.... Mike....</p>

<p>John is so fortunate to be at the Naval Academy. I hope his family starts to learn the meaning of love and support.</p>

<p>
[quote]
She begged me to call a naval lieutenant Monday morning to start the out-processing forms for my brother

[/quote]
</p>

<p>I'm sure her brother really appreciated that one! :rolleyes:</p>

<p>hmmm.....now it says that site is down 'until further notice'......</p>

<p>Gee. And to think I've been miffed at my older son for the last three years for sending photo copies of his behind to his little brother every day of Indoc with little notes like, "Wish you were here" "Missing you", ect. I recall asking alot if he'd written his brother & he would grin & say, "I sure have" only to find out at parents week-end what he'd been up to. I think I can now lay it to rest.</p>

<p>Something here just doesn't ring true. How can a relative begin outprocessing for a cadet/mid? What kind of mother is such a mess that she has to call her college-age daughter to handle a parental task? (Okay, I know some messed up parents, too.) Why would anyone even think they can even do this? I just have a sneaky feeling the sister/author embellished her article a bit (a lot?).</p>

<p>Might be sour grapes. The spot light was taken away from Ms.Columbia. She made sure that the spot light was put back on her. Her self embellishment in the first paragraph gave her away.</p>

<p>Momoftwins, you took my words and pixeled them exactly! Site is still down.
Author's name bugs me. Idris was a male Koranic poet.
Here's another article she wrote for the Spectator:
<a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/college/student-center/UWire/UWire_060420_brief.php%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/college/student-center/UWire/UWire_060420_brief.php&lt;/a>
Sort of sums her up.
Blogging about her article:
<a href="http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/239790.php%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/239790.php&lt;/a>
I'm pretty liberal, but have lots of respect for the service academies and students who are chosen to go there. It is elite, it is a calling, and it is education for a higher cause.</p>

<p>After reading the other link that she wrote for, I really can't imagine her being part of "Generation M" for media. More like "Generation I" for idiot. Columbia, or any university that would accept her as a student should be totally ashamed and embarassed to admit that she is a student of their's. She is a disgrace to her brother who seems like an honorable person. She is a disgrace to her community. She ISN'T a disgrace to her mother, because her mother is even more of a loser.</p>

<p>Whewwwww; Feel much better now. LOL!!! Mike....</p>

<p>The Columbia site is still down. So is the blog site. Weird.</p>

<p>Does anyone at USNA know John Leppla? How's he doing with all of this?</p>

<p>Or another question might be is there really such a person currently at the Academy? A few of the prior posters raised questions about some of the statements in the article.</p>