May 2013 SAT Discussion Thread

Test Preparation SAT Preparation
661

<p>dislodge seemed too much like the textbook definition</p>

662

<p>ok does anyone want to discuss writing??? which No Errors did you get for identifying errors???</p>

663

<p>Yep it was 48</p>

664

<p>I put acknowledge as well</p>

665

<p>please tell me the CR about Venice was experimental…</p>

666

<p>I put acknowledge for that one.</p>

667

<p>Anyone with what section # was the experimental is?</p>

668

<p>@ kentrian</p>

<p>Do you remember what the grid-in question said that had an answer of 2?</p>

669

<p>Need a few answers:</p>

<p>Math:

  1. What was the answer to the one where you had to find the Median of all odd integers through 101? Choices were 99, 99.5, 100, 100.5, 101.
  2. Was the Hexagon one 96?
  3. Was the answer to the one where it was G(X) and you had to find G(P) or whatever, was that answer 3?
  4. Also, the fill in question where it was like 2x-1 or something, what was that answer?
    Vocab:
  5. What was the Einstein question answer if anyone knows?</p>
670

<p>this thread is definitely just the same people asking the same question over and over lol</p>

671

<p>@kentrian I don’t remember 1 as an answer.</p>

672

<p>can anyone provide me a score chart so i can predict scores?</p>

673

<p>writing anyone???
@letsgoyankees: 1. 101
2. 96
3. 6.7
4. i don’t remember that one…
vocab: postulate</p>

674

<p>@invainortrue I never got Venice, so yep, it was experimental!</p>

675

<p>Also, what was the answer to the graph question, where the choices were -1/2, -3, -10, -12?</p>

676

<p>I never got the 101 median question or whatever. Was it experimental?</p>

677

<p>the math question with a graph, did f(x)=3(not sure what number it was) 3 times?</p>

678

<p>Lol my post count went up so much from this one thread.</p>

679

<p>some writing questions:

  1. improving paragraphs(the one before the really iffy one): had been…
  2. why isn’t the iffy one “only grumpily” rather than “had grumpily”???
  3. 3 No Errors??? One of them was verb tense, the other was the long one, and the other i forget</p>
680

<p>Correct me if im wrong, but all the 19th century thing said was that one lie leads to another lie which leads to another. thats all i got from it. No degregation of the moral conscience, no danger, nothing. If that’s the case then it has to be pointing out faulty logic</p>