<p>Was one of the options for the researchers question leave it the same. Idk what I put, so I might have put that</p>
<p>Oh - what about the therefore question.</p>
<p>therefore its origins blah blah </p>
<p>and sid, i think the question after the basque language question is the one im talkin about!</p>
<p>A note regarding parallelism in the lemon one:</p>
<p>I’m almost positive that one thing cannot be “more” or “less” edible than another.
It’s either edible, or it’s not.
I put no error.</p>
<p>What section was this edible one. And was it in the last 4. </p>
<p>Also. The question about over x amount of years. Over should be more than right.</p>
<p>and sid, i think the question after the basque language question is the one im talkin about! </p>
<p>black people and SOUL TRAIN TV SHOW. It was like 1970s and 1980s, having pop stars blah blah. was it having?</p>
<p>and anyone else get indeed, researchers.</p>
<p>i don’t think it was “1970s and 1980s, having pop stars…”
i cant remember what i put though</p>
<p>no it wasnt “indeed, researchers”</p>
<p>it was about that TV soul train or something…</p>
<p>I chose “indeed, researchers now…”
because that one had the best transition out of all of the choices</p>
<p>For the essay I had 2 examples from history and 1 personal experience. My first example was good, my second was terrible, and my third was so-so. Any chance I can still get a 10? I used a couple of good vocab words and I filled the entire two pages.</p>
<p>Also, what was the answer to the identifying errors that said “Noticing Kim and I looking at a panda…” or something like that. I remember ‘I’ was underlined.</p>
<p>ruthie: the previous paragraph from that sentence was talking about how play didn’t seemed to have an evolutionary advantage to their lives. the sentence about researchers was saying how they found a possible evolutionary advantage. so it doesn’t make sense to say indeed, but rather to say however.</p>
<p>qwerty: i think said that was wrong because i thought it was kim and me</p>
<p>I think it may have been something like: “…1970s and 1980s, showcasing…”</p>
<p>ahhh i remember now, i put “…1970s and 1980s, it showcased…” was gonna put showcasing but ended up with showcased</p>
<p>@yoursky
i think you might be right actually but it all depends on the wording of the first paragraph. i thought the first paragraph recognizes that play MIGHT have benefits and the second supports that claim by saying “indeed, researchers…”.</p>
<p>@ Xtol123 It was “showcasing”…</p>
<p>Can anyone actually post their essay prompt (or a summary of it)? There is never just one prompt, so when you all talk about “the prompt” I’m sort of curious if you were all actually writing about the same topic. Thx!</p>
<p>did the experimental section have the one about animals and their play or the the girl talking about cooking for improving paragraph?</p>
<p>The experimental must’ve been about cooking. I had math experimental and I remember the animal’s play as something.</p>
<p>^ thanks. I was flipping out because i thought i missed about 5 in that section alone</p>
<p>The therefore question. Was it blah blah blah, therefore. Or blah blah blah and therefore</p>
<p>okay great, yeah for the soul train 70’s question, i just remember it was like question, “gerund” so therefore it must have been showcasing.</p>
<p>what were the other no errors?</p>