<p>^colon’s main function is reabsorption of water</p>
<p>“and how about that lab with the birch and the beech? What was the answer to the last question about what does not need to be done to keep the experiment constant? I think the choices were:
keep the temp. constant
trim the leaves
keep the light constant
keep them disease free
and (something else i can’t remember).”</p>
<p>i put the constant temp b/c all the trees are being exposed to the same temp no matter what</p>
<p>no trimmed leaves b/c leaves are vital to photosynthesis. If you wanted to see which tree would be better off in a certain climate, would you trim the leaves? No, you’d mess up the results, in nature the leaves aren’t trimmed so you wouldn’t see which would survive longer in the scale of succession.</p>
<p>Did anyone get 4 D’s in a row?</p>
<p>I think I got 5 D’s in a row. lol</p>
<p>Yeah I got 4 straight D’s also…towards the end I think?</p>
<p>Yea thanks golfer</p>
<p>if i skipped 10 and got maybe… 6 wrong?
what is my score?
and was this may test harder than others?</p>
<p>For the tree question…</p>
<p>Its because trees only grow at their roots and their stems. So the place in the trunk where the malfuntion was did not move at all. Therefore it was at the same height that it was when it was injured. I think it was 9 ft. above the ground?</p>
<p>It was 0.9 feet I believe, answer E?</p>
<p>Yes it was .9 feet. Trees grow wider, and taller, at the growing tissue regions (meristomatic tissue).</p>
<p>what books did you guys use/find most useful?</p>
<p>PR was great, just didn’t cover enough material
Kaplan had useless information, (TMI)</p>
<p>I wish I tried barrons. It seems like they had a good book for bio</p>
<p>i used the PR subject test book and the cliffs AP bio book. when used together, most if not all, of the material was covered</p>
<p>i used the PR. if i had more time, i would’ve tried another one, but i’m pretty sure i got about a 770 with it if i didnt make any careless mistakes or got any wrong not covered on this board. i also didn’t much attention in my AP bio class, so i impressed myself.</p>
<p>i used the bio book, and it was really useful. it covered most of the information, but the book has some sections with too much information and some sections with too little. A tutor or another book are good as supplements.</p>
<p>But i think princeton review has the best tests out of all of them. The barron’s is slightly harder, and the spark notes tests were pretty much on par with the test… but there are a lot of bad questions.</p>
<p>i know that one of the questions in one of my review book (PR’s i think) was the exact same as one of the questions on the actual subject test so that was a nice and welcome surprise</p>
<p>sigh. what r “good scores” for the subject tests for say, middle schools, low ivies, and top ivies?</p>
<p>Guys, I’m a freshman that just finished my ap biology exam today. I’m going to be taking the biology sat in about 1 month. Could anyone give me suggestions on which prep book to use and if I should choose E or M? Thanks in advance!</p>
<p>I took honors biology this year, and i’m reviewing with Barron’s and PR. I’m getting ~85% of the review questions in the Barron’s book right. Do you think this is enough to get a 700 on the test?</p>