<p>I can live with input I don't agree. I can even like it and switch sides when argued persuasively and inarticulately! What a concept!</p>
<p>But frankly, I'm not a huge fan of your attitude towards all these fragile self esteems especially this period. Wellesley prides itself in being collaborative and supportive something you aren't representing at the moment. If I read all your posts without knowing Wellesley students myself, I would be turned off.</p>
<p>Shooting down applicant's self esteem isn't exactly the most helpful at this period. But I do agree that inflating a student's chances is also detrimental. Give advice. You can even leave unfavorable stats but don't say there's no chance. Leave the interpretation up to us. I think we’re intelligent enough to analyze it.</p>
<p>When I read what you just wrote." Dostoevsky, the odds are against you, probably 3-1. Yes, you can get admitted, but planning upon it given those odds doesn't seem prudent." Just the way you structured the sentence, demonstrates your pessimism and negativity. You present the bad first and implant it and then provide a possibility. A more favorable and political answer would had been, "you have about a 1 in 3 chance(I think it's closer to 1 in 4)..Good luck!" it leaves the answer for interpretation and the girl (who probably has enough intelligence) will know that the odds are against her but there's still a chance." With this high achieving schools, it's important to make plans for the worst...thus we apply to safeties. But hope is what we live on.</p>
<p>You can't say I haven't been asking whether X or Y is better because you don’t know what I do privately. I have been privately with those affiliated with Wellesley, who’s credibility I do trust. </p>
<p>I reiterate again. I was simply surprised that there wasn't that personal touch that I love about Wellesley. That's all. Perhaps I'm comparing Wellesley to a school that's a lot more personable and tries to make applicants feel better. Here's the differentiation since I've stated this so many times subtly throughout my posts and yet you have not caught on.</p>
<p>I THOUGHT Wellesley would be more personable and would try to make the process less harrowing. I don't NEED them to give me a checklist. I HOPED that they would provide points for me to focus on in my additional information.</p>
<p>Need. Is a very strong word. I am completely capable of drawing up what I have I just wanted a little more insight as I've been provided through the Caltech forum and people. (Yes, I know what a contrast..there's a long story as to how I applied to both) If I was asking somebody to save me, it would be equivalent to asking somebody write out my resume and have a student persuade the admissions office to let me in. I'm not. As Dostoevsky pointed out, I'm simply asking for further input. As advantagious and millionlittlepieces graciously gave. I never know what I can evoke or dig up in these forums.</p>
<p>But thanks for staying on these threads and providing the information that many applying girls are looking for. We're glad for the facts and trends but not for the negative attitude. Your response would probably be like...oh but I should have to baby around mature prospective Wellesley bound applicants. Remember how your daughter felt after getting rejected from Yale? </p>
<p>When you tell us there's no hope..it almost feels like a rejection for many. Now imagine if she was deferred. We would feel that pressure. Please don't give decisive decisions out like that when you aren't affiliated. </p>
<p>Btw even after these comments, I really appreciate your presence on this site as parents like you who have endured through these processes understand the trends and cycles that tend to occur and provide informative insight. Perhaps it's been too long since you experienced that anxiety..but I urge you to be more sensitive to those around.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>