<p>"Some of the posters on cc seem a lttle oblivious to the fact that this is a huge diverse country, and many kids have hs experiences very very different from those in coastal urban or suburban areas."</p>
<p>This issue is a lot more complex than the scope of this earlier discussion was. However, it IS because our country is so diverse and that access to certain program is so uneven that I'd like to see restrictions imposed on a number of programs. While there are schools that have become glowing AP factories, other schools present a very distinct image, including some that are refusing to "dance" with Gaston, and have punted the AP program entirely. </p>
<p>A lot of the logic behind the "defense" is circular at best. However, this is not a discussion about the validity of the AP program nor about what I have called its "abject explosion," it is about how those programs are evaluated in admissions and more specifically how students react to the results of admission decisions. Does anyone really believe that the explosion of IB programs in Texas and Florida is unrelated to the admissions policies? </p>
<p>This is what I see as a negative pattern: Elite school XYZ accepts students with an average of 6 APs ... the next year everyone scrambles to get 8. And there is the beginning of a vicious circle as the school reacts to "better prepared" students. In turn, parents are FORCED to program a competitive MIDDLE SCHOOL program because without the pre-requisites, it would hard to take the necessary AP starting in ... 9th grades. Students do not end up with 10-15 AP by accident. </p>
<p>That would be fine by me, IF we would simply acknowledge and accept that entering such a rat race is what is REQUIRED to be competitive in admission at the most elite schools. This is why I lament the contradiction and ambiguity between the "recover the summer" messages sent by Marilee Jones or Fitzsimmons and the ... press releases of January and April extolling the increasing greatness of each class.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, I expect MORE from a school such as MIT because it CAN institute positive changes, and has a Dean who has started a very vocal crusade on this issue. If there is one school who can attract Intel finalist, MIT is the one. It is also the school that could EASILY build a class of equal value without rewarding a SPECIFIC award or program. Would the quality of the applicant pool, or the chose class be ANY less impressive were the Intel cancelled? Isn't that where the holistic reviews pays dividends? </p>
<p>In my opinion, there are few reasons for very competitive programs to have to rely on crutches, or reward them as they DO. There are, however, reasons to cut through this gordian knot and realize that without drastic and direct changes to the MESSAGES sent, parents will continue to seek the "perfect" resume and will continue to BUY it. Colleges officials love to decry the "explosion" of commercialism-- with the help of hollow loudmouths--as the main cause behind all the ills in the process. Yet, they see no harm in hosting programs that are very commercial ventures, or reward programs that are testaments to the SUNY-like "resources" one can put together, and all but closed to little Cindy from Waco, Texas.</p>
<p>Something has to give. And it DOES start at our biggest and best schools.</p>