Name your top 8 for each of the following three categories: Ivies, non-ivy private,..

<p>Ivy League Universities (undergraduate colleges of arts and sciences):
Princeton
Harvard-Yale
Columbia-Dartmouth-Brown
Penn-Cornell</p>

<p>Non-Ivy League National Universities (undergraduate colleges of arts and science):
Stanford
Duke-Notre Dame-Georgetown
Chicago-Northwestern
Rice-WUSTL</p>

<p>Liberal Arts Colleges:
Williams-Amherst
Swarthmore-Wellesley-Middlebury-Pomona
Wesleyan-Haverford</p>

<p>Public Universities (OOS):
Berkeley
UVA-UNC
CUNY, Hunter College (Macaulay Honors Program)-UMass Amherst (scholly)-Michigan
UCLA
USC</p>

<p>^^^kwu. You really think that the University of South Carolina is that strong?</p>

<p>Vinzzini,</p>

<p>Your predictions on post #53 regarding military academies were correct (see the attached list). </p>

<p>Institution Admit Rate Total Admits Who Enrolled (Yield) Yield/Admitted Rate
USNavy 8% 98% 12.25
USAF 14% 97% 6.93
USArmy 14% 81% 5.79 </p>

<p>santeria,</p>

<p>I agree with your statement:</p>

<p>”After a certain point, acceptance rates shouldn’t be taken too seriously. I’m sure some of the more famous schools have inflated acceptance rates because a higher percentage of applicants are unqualified.”</p>

<p>That’s why we presumed “Selectivity is a function of yield, acceptance rate, SATs, GPA, class rank, etc.” instead of only acceptance rate.</p>

<p>Ivy:
Harvard
Princeton
Columbia
Yale
Brown
Upenn
Dartmouth
Cornell</p>

<p>Non Ivy (Private)
Stanford
MIT
Duke
Caltech
JHU
WashU
Northwestern
UChicago</p>

<p>Public:
Berkley (for sure #1 public)
UNC -CH (well great price for in-state…)
UofM
UCLA
UVA</p>

<p>ehh then other ones… bleh</p>

<p>LACs and research universities, while both private and non-ivy, should be ranked separately. I almost think it makes sense to create a category like “Research Ivies” or “Science Ivies”.</p>

<p>Thanks for digging up the service academy data. I don’t know if they qualify as “public universities”, but if they did I would definitely have all 3 in the top 8 of public universities. In terms of prestige, academics and especially global influence, they definitely warrant consideration.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Exactly. Acceptance rate is an important metric, but it is usually roughly ~10% of a “selectivity” ranking:</p>

<p>Non-Ivy Private Student Selectivity:</p>

<p>1 Cal Tech
4 MIT
7 WUSTL
11 Stanford
15 Duke
16 Williams
17 Amherst
18 Northwestern
25 Chicago
29 JHU</p>

<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/college-search-selection/687793-selectivity-ranking-national-us-lacs-combined-usnews-method.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/college-search-selection/687793-selectivity-ranking-national-us-lacs-combined-usnews-method.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>Ivy:
Harvard
Princeton
Columbia
Yale
Dartmouth
Upenn
Cornell
Brown</p>

<p>Non Ivy (Private)
Stanford
MIT
Caltech
JHU
Duke
Northwestern
UChicago
Wash U</p>

<p>Public:
Berkeley (for sure #1 public)
UofM
UCLA
Wisconsin
UNC
UVA
UCSD
Washington</p>

<p>Modeling: That calculation still does not take into account the quality of all applicants, only of those admitted. Many schools are more self-selecting than others. </p>

<p>And on the Williams/Amherst debate: I would say there’s no significant difference between Williams, Amherst, Swarthmore, Pomona, and Middlebury. USN tries to differentiate them, but it’s more opinion than anything else. There’s a reason that LACs are generally ranked separately.</p>

<p>To make an accurate list with as low a number as 8, you would need to be more specific, as different schools have different strengths. So far, this is simply a prestige list and the people posting are only going in order of what they have heard, rather than researching which school actually seems to be better in something. My list for undergraduate education would be very different from my list of prestige. This is just a USN list right now.</p>

<p>I just have a question -
Why does Brown get consistently lower ranked than Columbia, Upenn, Dartmouth?</p>

<p>Ivy:
Princeton
Cornell
Penn
Columbia
Brown
I don’t know or care after this point…</p>

<p>Non-Ivy Private:
MIT
Stanford
Caltech
Northwestern
Carnegie Mellon
Rice
Johns Hopkins
USC</p>

<p>Public:
UC-Berkeley
Michigan
Georgia Tech
Illinois
Texas
Purdue
Wisconsin
UCLA or Texas A&M or Minnesota or Washington… not sure which</p>

<p>I’m looking at engineering, obviously.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>This is a good list except that I’d put Yale ahead of Columbia.</p>

<p>^ why is Brown the last ivy on your list? I don’t understand.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Agreed.</p>

<p>Also have to take into consideration: class size, financial aid, aggressive recruiting, etc.</p>

<p>IVY:
Harvard, Princeton
Yale
Columbia
Cornell Penn
Brown
Dartmouth</p>

<p>Non IVYprivate
Stanford, MIT
Caltech
Chicago
Johns Hopkins, Carnegie Mellon, Duke, Northwestern, Washington U, Rice</p>

<p>Public
Berkeley, UCSF
gap
Wisconsin, UCLA, Michigan, UIUC, Texas-Austin
U of Washington, Minnesota, UCSD
UNC-Chapel Hill, Penn State, U of Maryland, Georgia Tech, Virginia, Rutgers, UC-Davis, UCSB, Purdue, Indiana-Bloomington, Texas A &M</p>

<p>Harvard/Yale
Princeton
Penn/Columbia/Dartmouth
Brown
Cornell</p>

<p>Stanford
MIT/Cal Tech/Williams/Amherst/Chicago
JHU/Northwestern/Swarthmore/Duke/Wash U</p>

<p>Berkeley
Michigan/UNC/UVA/W&M/UCLA
Wisconsin/Texas/Washington/Georgia Tech</p>

<p>improvmylife, Brown is a fine institute. I believe our fellow CCer, ModestMelody can provide you with a brighter picture in Brown.</p>

<p>Kwu, your list illustrates an excellent idea of apple to apple and orange to orange comparisons among undergraduate LACs. Only a few elite public universities e.g. UVA, W&M, Michigan, UNC, Berkeley, UCLA, Florida, etc. would be able to attract significant number of applicants. Despite the fact that OOS undergraduate usually require to pay a significant higher tuition than their IS counter parts, which is an obvious disadvantage from the moneywise sand point, however, these public universities tend to turndown more OOS than their IS applicants (see UVA’s admissions stats as an example). Isn’t it a way to define selectivity? </p>

<p>UVA’s admissions stats CLASS OF 2014:
Total applications received: 22,520
Virginia applications: 7,864 (35 percent)
Out-of-state applications: 14,656 (65 percent)
Total offers made by UVA: 6,907 (31 percent)
Virginia offers: 3,380 (43 percent of Virginia applications)
Out-of-state offers: 3,527 (24 percent of out-of-state applications)</p>

<p>Noimagination, you have an excellent list regarding engineering schools. Do you have their breakdowns between undergraduate and graduate education? I believe there should be some differences between these two.</p>

<p>aI62400, “LACs and research universities, while both private and non-ivy, should be ranked separately. I almost think it makes sense to create a category like “Research Ivies” or “Science Ivies” was thoughtful and challenging. </p>

<p>Sentaria,</p>

<p>Yes, in order to take into account the quality of all applicants, it would make sense to also examine data e.g., average GPA, SATs, Class Rank, etc. of the rejected (an unpleasant adjective) applicants. </p>

<p>Furthermore, I believe it makes no harm if fellow CCers take their liberty of making lists of top 8 in broader categories like the ones posted by kwu and noimagination on posts #61 and #71 as long as you can back them up. </p>

<p>Vinzzini, yes, all three service academies should warrant consideration and they belong to the category National Liberal Arts Colleges (LACs).</p>

<p>As an example, based on the cross-admitted students’ preferences, the new look of my list is shown as follows. </p>

<p>Ivy League Universities:</p>

<p>Rank Type Institute Score
1 4 Harvard University 93
2 4 Yale University 92
3 4 Princeton University 91
5 4 University of Pennsylvania 89
7 4 Brown University 87
10 4 Cornell University 83
11 4 Dartmouth College 83
12 4 Columbia University 82</p>

<p>Non-Ivy League National Universities:</p>

<p>Rank Type Institute Score
4 1 Stanford University 89
6 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 88
9 1 Duke University 85
14 1 University of Notre Dame 79
16 1 Rice University 78
17 1 University of Chicago 77
19 1 Georgetown University 75
21 1 University of Southern California 72
22 1 Northwestern University 72
24 1 Caltech 69</p>

<p>Liberal Arts Colleges:</p>

<p>Rank Type Institute Score
8 2 Pomona College 86
20 2 Williams College 74
32 2 Muhlenberg College 60
33 2 Swarthmore College 60
36 2 Colgate University 55
38 2 Wesleyan University 55
40 2 United States Air Force Academy 54
43 2 Emerson College 50
48 2 College of the Holy Cross 45
49 2 Washington and Lee University 44</p>

<p>Public Universities :</p>

<p>Rank Type Institute Score
13 3 University of California, Berkeley 80
15 3 University of California, Los Angeles 79
18 3 University of Virginia 75
23 3 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 71
26 3 College of William and Mary in Virginia 68
28 3 University of Michigan - Ann Arbor 64
30 3 University of Florida 64
34 3 Georgia Institute of Technology 60
42 3 University of Texas at Austin 52
45 3 University of Maryland, College Park 49</p>

<p>

Nonsense. Santeria is referring to a self-selecting applicant pool that results in more qualified enrolled (pleasant adjective) students. Despite a relatively higher acceptance rate, some schools will still have an exceptionally qualified student body (enrolled stats). For example, UChicago, which for many years had an acceptance rate in the 40s, has always maintained a high-caliber student body based on GPA, SATs, Class Rank, etc. </p>

<p>Non-Ivy Private Stats:</p>

<ol>
<li><p>Cal Tech
[College</a> Navigator - California Institute of Technology](<a href=“College Navigator - California Institute of Technology”>College Navigator - California Institute of Technology)</p></li>
<li><p>MIT
[College</a> Navigator - Massachusetts Institute of Technology](<a href=“College Navigator - Massachusetts Institute of Technology”>College Navigator - Massachusetts Institute of Technology)</p></li>
<li><p>WUSTL
[College</a> Navigator - Washington University in St Louis](<a href=“College Navigator - Washington University in St Louis”>College Navigator - Washington University in St Louis)</p></li>
<li><p>Stanford
[College</a> Navigator - Stanford University](<a href=“College Navigator - Stanford University”>College Navigator - Stanford University)</p></li>
<li><p>Duke
[College</a> Navigator - Duke University](<a href=“College Navigator - Duke University”>College Navigator - Duke University)</p></li>
<li><p>Williams
[College</a> Navigator - Williams College](<a href=“College Navigator - Williams College”>College Navigator - Williams College)</p></li>
<li><p>Amherst
[College</a> Navigator - Amherst College](<a href=“College Navigator - Amherst College”>College Navigator - Amherst College)</p></li>
<li><p>Northwestern
[College</a> Navigator - Northwestern University](<a href=“College Navigator - Northwestern University”>College Navigator - Northwestern University)</p></li>
<li><p>Chicago
[College</a> Navigator - University of Chicago](<a href=“College Navigator - University of Chicago”>College Navigator - University of Chicago)</p></li>
<li><p>JHU
[College</a> Navigator - Johns Hopkins University](<a href=“College Navigator - Johns Hopkins University”>College Navigator - Johns Hopkins University)</p></li>
</ol>

<p>Gatsby11, I evaluated average GPA, SATs, and Class Rank data (from CollegeData.com) for the accepted students in my last iteration. This time, in order to take into account the quality of all applicants, I intend to review average GPA, SATs, and Class Rank data for the rejected applicants. All applicants= accepted + rejected. It’s NO nonsense. It’s a scientific approach.</p>

<p>

False.

False.</p>