@dallaspiano Cry! Cry! My D got a 33 on ACT…(36,35,24,36)… she bombed on reading because she didn’t get to the last paragraph & she bubbled all A’s for all questions of last paragraph 10 more minutes would be great.
And now more tears a 23 on the essay! Several of her friends all got 23 including one with with 221 PSAT! I feel so sorry for class 2017!
@SLparent, with 33 ACT and possible NMF award (if 211 true), she will get more free everything (tuition, room&board, books, fees and etc…) plus $200/month in cash at UTD
Does anyone know if you have to do anything besides score well on the PSAT to become a NMSF? I think I’m good for the cut with a 1480 and 221 SI, but I am a bit confused about how the process works. Is there an application I have to fill out beforehand?
@Aztreas no applications or forms until the SF’s are announced. There will be a few things that need to be done to advance to finalist status, one of which would be to have your SI score “vetted” by taking the SAT.
The guidebook will give you the details on process:
@SLparent…still no essay score yet on the ACT. @dallaspiano…UTD gives a full ride for 34 ACT score? Really? My S had a composite score of 34 on the ACT. 34…36…34…31 science killed him. Our school is not strong in the science area. @SLparent…PSAT…I sure hope you are correct. I would love to take a deep breath.
When I made an analysis in msg #156. My assumption is based on Normal Distribution of PSAT scores and I also reserved a small corner - just in case the PSAT behaves Not Normal Distribution.
@dallaspiano Would you be in a position to predict the NMSF PSAT cutoff for New Jersey, California, and Virginia, based on your statistical analysis for Texas? Thanks.
@kantmakm, that must be St. Mark. No surprise, school for the rich, the famous, the smart descendants of North TX
"The National Merit Scholarship Program has honored two-thirds of the Class of 2016, naming 27 seniors Semifinalists and 31 seniors Commended Scholars. Statuses are based on each student’s 2014 PSAT/NMSQT scores. " http://www.smtexas.org/page/News-Detail?pk=775816
Look like you have some connection to St. Mark HS?
On Normal Distribution
Typically, a larger sample size renders data that fall into a normal distribution curve. Since a large number of students took the test, it is reasonable to assume the scores were normally distributed
Why the mean score and standard deviation on the PSAT may differ from year to year?
While scores on the exams may be normally distributed over time, scores for particular years may have unique centers (means) and spreads (standard deviations). In fact, such variations from year to year are expected.
Can the mean score on the PSAT be the same for two years but the standard deviations different?
Yes, two normal distributions based on actual data may have the same mean but different standard deviations. Mean is a measure of center, whereas standard deviation is a measure of the spread of the data. For example, if two people took the test and both scored 150, their mean would be 150, but the standard deviation of their scores would be 0. The next year, two people could score 140 and 160. Their mean is still 150, but the standard deviation is 10.
@dallaspiano …had to step away for awhile. UNT has a pretty good scholarship for NMF. It is a contender as of right now. Okay…now what are you predicting Texas NMSF cutoff at now? I leave the technical numbers up to you…I just follow and watch.
@dallaspiano I thought you’d be interested in looking at data from HISD. The means from HISD are lower than TX and TX means are lower than the nation.
However, there are a lot of private schools in Houston with kids score well on PSAT. Plus, there are target kids from HISD that get subsidy for prep class from HISD that do very well on the PSAT, so this explains the large disparity in scores.