<h2>Quilt--I put self-denial....</h2>
<h2>Why did she call him Dee (other name in parantheses)--i narrowed it down to A and C or something like that. can't remember the choice.</h2>
<h2>Yes, crumble like a statue and cease to exist.</h2>
<h2>i don't even remember a geese passage haha</h2>
<p>that was a hard passage indeed. i wasn't really sure how severely he wanted it changed.</p>
<p>Hypocritical? I think I put like feigned indifference or something. Anyway, the more I think about it, the more I think u're right. I thought he swept the floor for glass particles in the flesh Q.</p>
<p>Why does she call her daughter Dee (some other name) -- because she wasn't sure about her daughter's intentions? I think that was A. What was C?</p>
<p>definitely did not sweep floor for glass in that passage.....had something to do with extinguishing the fire on his hand..............</p>
<p>The problem is that I don't even remember extinguishing the fire as one of the choices. This is bad.</p>
<p>i agree with her daughter's intentions...another one was something about her identity. stuck in the middle w/those two.</p>
<p>i thought it was identity</p>
<p>omg, i totally misunderstood the charles one. i said 1) it was the shards of glass and 2) it showed he wasn't over the experience</p>
<p>that's already 2. </p>
<p>for maggie, i said she displayed diplomacy, for mourning, i said mourning will eventually cease to exist, and i said thr author himself did not heed his example.</p>
<p>and i also thought it was identity. and did she value maggie's ability to quilt more then the quilt itself?</p>
<p>^what i put</p>
<p>does anyone have any idea what the curve will look like?</p>
<p>how many questions on 'charles on fire' did i get wrong if i didn't know about the fire? </p>
<p>so there was 1) why was charles eerily glowing or w/e 2) how did he become flesh again? or something like that? 3) what did his glance in the mirror mean</p>
<p>this kind of sucks. i wish i resisted the temptation to look at this forum.</p>
<p><em>phew</em> I also interpreted Charles as having his hand on fire and it looked etheral and he kind of "swept" the fire off his hand...</p>
<p>It wasn't meekness in mourning, I don't remember what it was, but that was the first one I eliminated. He was talking about passionless grief, NOT meekness, which he elaborated on at great length.</p>
<p>Didn't like the fish one, the rest were alot of fun.</p>
<p>Maggie - it was self-denial, which was hinted at throughout the passage, how she was doing the dishes, left to hide her feelings when Dee wanted it, and spoke it with resignation.</p>
<p>i don't think etheral was an answer. but i cant remember the choices</p>
<p>i don't think etheral was an answer. but i cant remember the choices</p>
<p>I thought it was...I think I remember it asking what the "lumination" described in relation to his hand or something like that...</p>
<p>was one of the answers outwards appearance of all peope or good looking people present?</p>
<p>what was the whole point of the first passage?
was the scene tangible?
what was the whole point of that one line? something to do with commerce?
what was the whole theme?</p>
<p>I said it was people's outward characteristics, because the people in the discussion "squared their shoulders at their unloveliness" so I didn't think it could have been those present...</p>
<p>The first passage described the scene in London and compared it to the corruption of the Lord C'something who was a corrupt judge or politition, the one mentioned in the beginning and end...</p>
<p>yeah i said outward charracteristics
it was tangible atmosphere describing legal system in london</p>