<p>I don't think there are too many heavy drinkers on the CC threads because nobody knew that guy's hand was really on fire. lol. </p>
<p>I guess heavy teen drinkers don't take SAT IIs.</p>
<p>was it begin a journey or something about purpose of journey with the geese</p>
<p>let's discuss the first one about pollution/the chancellor</p>
<p>was it the court was corrupt? i had little/no idea throughout that one.</p>
<p>actually that was the easiest question
and i thought the test was difficult.</p>
<p>we learned the word freshman year</p>
<p>I would love to discuss the passages, but I am a little paranoid about the rules. Maybe you guys should be too. I must say, however, that I really enjoyed them... all but ONE, and I think you know which one I am referring to...</p>
<p><em>swim</em></p>
<p>I answered the apostrphe, because I didn't think the others were close to right, but now I can't remember the question so I don't know if I was right or wrong....</p>
<p>The first one had a hard passage but easy questions, so it equated out all right. Yes, compared the "tangible london atmosphere" to the corrupt judge guy who represented teh court system of London.</p>
<p>So was Apostrophe one of the answers? Does anyone remember the answer to the Q in the Grief passage that had Roman numerals? U had to say what the monumental statue represented or something. Wow now I feel terrible because of the Charles on Fire passage. </p>
<p>I don't even remember the Qs about the fish...Oh! Who was the speaker?</p>
<p>Edit: Were the answers "tangible atmosphere" and Chancellor's cruelty answers to DIFFERENT Qs or within the same answer? I feel like I'm confusing 2 questions together.</p>
<p>i dont think i put apostrophe, i put repetition. but i have no clue.</p>
<p>Was this the Q about the Books and which method was NOT used in the passage?</p>
<p>yes. i think apostrophe was used because doesn't referencing the heavans count as an abstraction.</p>
<p>yeah on the books one, i guessed apostrophe, because i dont know about balance, it had repetition, and it also had the other 2 choices (personfication and something else)...so it was between balance and apostrophe</p>
<p>I don't think Apostrophe has to do with abstractions.....I thought it was a direct address to an object/person that is not present. The way I reasoned through Balance was that he kinda mentioned both sides of the argument (books incite rebellion; books should be free).</p>
<p>remember it's what it didn't have.
it had balance as julina said. it was directly addressing god and heavan at the end.</p>
<p>it didn't really have repetition!</p>
<p>but thq question asked which one is NOT...so do u agree that it was apostrophe in this case?</p>
<p>i think i found repetition at the end when it talked about killing books and god...all those chiasmuses</p>
<p>I remember looking at the Q and thinking to myself that it DEFINITELY had repetition. Does anyone remember the specific repetition that was used?</p>
<p>I didn't remember it having any repetition. The part at the end was more balancing than repetition--presenting two extremes of dealing with the problem or whatever.</p>
<p>Oh, now I remember what I thought of at that moment. I think I said it had repetition because it had like 2 sentences talking about the relationship BTW good killing books and killing men. Maybe that's what I thought about...well, in either case, I didn't feel like he was making a direct address to anyone. It felt like he was giving a speech with an audience. And he was definitely not addressing the books...</p>
<p>i agree with jpps1.
There was NO repetition</p>
<p>"we are both ignorant" - was that the wife and husband didn't know when she would die?</p>
<p>what was with the thirst question with the cup</p>
<p>what did the syntax do in the second stanza? i put something like distinguish between fish and object??</p>
<ul>
<li><p>Yes, the wife and the husband didn't know when she was going to die.</p></li>
<li><p>Thirst...I said original use for the object? What was the answer to the first Q about who was most likely to express the poem?</p></li>
<li><p>I think I put the same as u, the thing about blurring the distinction BTW object and real fish?</p></li>
</ul>
<p>Edit: For the wife dying passage, what was her wish after her death? That her husband should remember her with love or think of her flaws as her virtues. I thought I found evidence that supported both answers in the passage...</p>