<p>
[quote]
Charlotte Simmons -- didn't you find it quite unbelievable, given this girl's background growing up as a level headed academic that when offered an opportunity to do serious research; she chose to wallow in depression INSTEAD of latching onto the research project and subsequent intellectual stimulation to bring herself to a healthy mental state?
This story projects a dysfunctional reaction which I don't think is the healthy norm -- is this truly a good book to offer to someone who is about to embark upon college and new found independence?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Achieving intellectual stimulation would have been the logical thing for Charlotte to do, whom I remember was characterized as an extremely bright, hard-working, eager student. But sometimes when you're feeling down, you inexplicably don't even want to do the logical thing that might eventually help you. You just don't want to do anything. People who are depressed often lose joy in doing even their favorite things.</p>
<p>Some people might find the sort of college lifestyle represented in the book to be realistic. In that respect, I don't think it's a bad thing for freshmen to read it. I doubt they'd get especially discouraged because, face it, the sort of behavior and dysfunction in the book reflects how a lot of college students actually are. As unpleasant as the book is, it's a bunch of pages glued together; that sort of environment can be found once you step out of your own dorm room.</p>
<p>My beef with the book was how excruciatingly awful it was to read. The review from the London Review of Books hit the nail on the head with their quotations from the book: LRB</a> · Theo Tait: Rutrutrutrutrutrutrutrut</p>
<p>
[quote]
Hoyts smile, for instance, is described as so warm, warm, warm, loving, loving, loving, so warm and loving and commanding, all commanding that Charlotte couldnt move. But later, when he deserts her, she gives way to sobs sobs sobs sobs sobs sobs racking racking racking racking racking racking convulsive sobs sobs sobs sobs sobs. A description of a basketball match begins: Static::::::::::: Static::::::::::: Static::::::::::: Static::::::::::: [repeat 12 further times] choked the Buster Bowl.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>That's not good writing. Emphasis through endless repetition is a stylistic conceit that is so simplistic it's meant to be considered unique and paradoxically profound, and thus impressive. It's not. It really is what it is: just bad writing.</p>