November 2009 SAT Math (US only)

<p>gracias… ya it think i remember it that way</p>

<p>Combine: You’re right, it was 5x.</p>

<p>On the prime question. I just remembered that it said three DISTINCT numbers add up to a prime number. Therefore it was 986.</p>

<p>^^^ Umm, no.</p>

<p>What did it say then?</p>

<p>You had it correct, but it didn’t say anything about no repeated numbers.</p>

<p>Then I got it wrong cuz it would have been 995 if it wasn’t distinct numbers</p>

<p>does everyone agree that for the number line one with the roman numerals it was II and III only?</p>

<p>Yes I do. All you had to do was plug in values</p>

<p>What was answer to question on grid where there were two trapezoids and had to find difference in area or something</p>

<p>Does anyone remember what choices II and III were on the numberline one?</p>

<p>did anyone get (10,8) as one of their multiple choice answers?</p>

<p>I don’t remember the question… it gave a point and asked what another point could =</p>

<p>Yes…that’s the correct answer for the question you’re thinking of.</p>

<p>does anyone remember a different I II III question? It had variables but don’t remember any number lines</p>

<p>i think the answer was II and III</p>

<p>I’m talking about a different one though. I got just II for the answer b/c after plugging in values, only one worked. also, it didn’t specify if any numbers were greater than others. it just said: which of the following equations would always work?</p>

<p>There was a number line one and the answer to that was II and III. If I remember correctly, the other one was II and III as well, but I may be misremembering the question.</p>

<p>i only had one I II III question so maybe it was a different form?</p>

<p>ok the NUMBER LINE ques. was experimental because I got 2,3 for the variable one and that was question number 16. in the 20 min section. ok and everyone here is talking mostly about the experimental section and don’t even know it…there was no dog question and all of that so yea there you go, now everyone knows which section was the experimental one!</p>

<p>considering I had an experimental reading section, I find it hard to believe that my mathematics section (secretly) was experimental. What they did this time was had multiple tests instead of simply having multiple forms. I wonder if this will affect the curving of the test or not though.</p>