November 2009 SAT Math (US only)

<p>The dog one was 6, if you read if carefully it clearly said he can only go through the same way once. Also they never asked how many times he can go back and forth, they only asked how many times he can go through the door. If he goes back, he goes on the same path over</p>

<p>Disagree with you, I still believe the answer was 12. The question explained that he goes through 2 doors to meet his master, then returns to go back to the original room. Definitely 12.</p>

<p>hah why does it matter, dog one was experimental.</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-...est-Curves.pdf[/url]”>http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-...est-Curves.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>for the link ^, i dont get how writings calculated; like if you miss 1, it shows a 78… does that mean ull get a 780 on writing if u miss only 1 on writing?? nd how does the essay score factor into that… im confused</p>

<p>and @ checkmate7, that dog question wasnt experimental</p>

<p>oh. well were there two math types? did you guys get “302” and “30 degrees” a or like, “995” for any of your answers [dog question people]?</p>

<p>checkmate7, you had a different version of the test. on our test there was a non-experimental dog question.</p>

<p>The dog one was definitely NOT experimental. I had it and my experimental was a reading section. And I believe it was 12. I put 6 but I made a dumb mistake so yeah.</p>

<p>there were two versions of the whole test! read the rest of the thread!</p>

<p>CrzyGmer I put 6 too and I’m quite sure the question didn’t ask for the dog to return back to the room. I still think it’s 6.</p>

<p>^The question asked to the owner and back to his original spot. If it was a simple 3 2 = 6, it would be way too easy for a “hard” question.</p>

<p>Dole it never asked for going back and forth. I would agree with you if they did.</p>

<p>Ones, the question clearly explained that the dog goes to see his master, then turns around and returns to the original room, without going through the same door twice.</p>

<p>I really don’t remember it saying that, I remember it saying how many different ways can it go through the doors without repeating himself. I don’t remember turning around and returning to original room. The question would be too long with all that info. But if I’m wrong then there goes my 800. Your changing the wording of the question to make yourself seem right. A lot of people on this forum posted 6 and when someone rephrased the question wrong they believed that 6 was wrong. I went through the whole thread and more people posted 6 then 12. I don’t think you remember the question clearly</p>

<p>I still disagree. The question would be way too simple if that was all it was asking, and math questions go from easy to hard.</p>

<p>3 x 2 = 6 wouldn’t be one of the last 4 math questions. That’s obvious.</p>

<p>The requirement that the dog must go through a door it hasn’t already went through is part of the the dog coming back. If you remembered that specific part of the question, then you should notice that requirement doesn’t belong to the part where dog only goes to the owner. In other words, yes, it said to there and back.
It was a 3 x 2 x 2 x 1 = 12.</p>

<p>

how can you repeat going through the doors if you only go one way?</p>

<p>^ Ha, good job owning him.
I’m also taking a wild guess that he didn’t get an 800 on the writing section. (you’re, than)</p>

<p>Don’t gang up on him =/</p>

<p>We’ll see when we get the answers back guys. Let’s just try to relax till then.</p>

<p>Yeah, guys, let’s not fight or pick on tiny grammatical errors. :|</p>