<p>7 wrong or 7 deducted raw points?</p>
<p>hey guys what were the other passages on the experimental one beside duck illusion???</p>
<p>7 wrong for 690 in Oct’s test.
The Cr section this time is much harder. And as a result the curve should NOT be that harsh…</p>
<p>Jane, could you explain why it is “undeserved”</p>
<p>Good to know Jane.
I can’t really remember the Qs from duck and rabbit experimental sections. But the Qs were pretty awkward.</p>
<p>Psych1, I didn’t choose that. I chose “harsh but accurate” and I believe most people got answers different from mine.</p>
<p>I want someone to make sense about ‘undeserved’
Anyway you mean 7 wrong or 7 raw points deducted</p>
<p>Guess what we’ve all been effed up by CB
<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/1158107-june-2011-sat-consolidated-answers.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/1158107-june-2011-sat-consolidated-answers.html</a></p>
<p>Wait, are those the right answers, Wharton?</p>
<p>Easy 2400. Can’t believe people actually made mistakes in this test.</p>
<p>didn’t somebody here post the exact same answers from that thread in this thread?</p>
<p>Pshy1
Yes I think so.</p>
<p>not sure, but just saying its an old US paper.
darkaeroga good for you then</p>
<p>Well. How do you come to that conclusion?</p>
<p>This is what Harvard dream posted…</p>
<p>Easy 2400? Good for you man.</p>
<p>Yep the title there is Consolidated Answers, so might be some sort of consolidated answers by a couple of people?</p>
<p>Can’t understand why collegeboard always reuses tests. People can cheat.</p>
<p>So not exact answers right?</p>
<p>It saves money. They just too lazy to make new tests. Anyway, let it be.</p>