NYU (NY) RD 2017 Discussion

<p>@Byahnoob</p>

<p>Yes, mine changed today to 2014 - NYU - Award Access not Available. This message is the one that everyone said before was the acceptance. This is the message in the little blue box. I’m sure I’m not the only one. If this holds true, I was one of the very last acceptances. Again, IF this holds true. I’m skeptical.</p>

<p>I bet the admission people are watching us right now and having the best times of their lives…</p>

<p>@bowtiesrcool - IKR lmao</p>

<p>Just out of curiosity, what is everyone currently considering the “good” sign to be?</p>

<p>With or without the 2014?</p>

<p>with 2014. I bet all the ppl with the 2014 still got in. the rest are all rejects/waitlists :(</p>

<p>Considering my luck, it’s probably the opposite. I thought this whole process was going to be a lot less stressful (silly me). I got rejected from all my reaches and most of my matches.</p>

<p>But… I’m sorry, I don’t understand what you guys are saying. My Albert account says “Award access not available” but why would that mean that I got accepted? Where are people getting that idea from? I’m not a HEOP applicant either… Wouldn’t that message more indicate a rejection? I’m so confused</p>

<p>Do you guys think decisions will be emailed to us at 5 o’ clock on Friday? Or sooner? What time were they sent to applicants last year?</p>

<p>PS it says that under Aid Year 2014… if that makes any differenc? Lol sorry I’m so ignorant about all this but what are you guys talking about with all this status change stuff? I didn’t even know what my original status was!</p>

<p>Nobody knows, Snooze, but people are inferring from previous ED threads and looking for any sort of correlations.</p>

<p>Oh, I see. Ok, see I’m obviously a little lost and confused in the college admissions process, but I think “2014 Award access not available” messages seem like a silly clue to jump at and assume admittance… is that what all the accepted applicants got last year, or what all the accepted EDs got this year?</p>

<p>Byahnoob, thanks, I posted before I read the thread. So does anyone’s still say no financial aid information found?</p>

<p>@snoozebutton yes the theory is based on edI and edII admitted/denied changes</p>

<p>Also - if you think about the way NYU gives aid, the glitch makes sense.
NYU partially bases your aid off of how much they want you … So the decisions have to come from admission first … THEN the financial aid office can determine a package
If you ask me, the “2014 award access not available” probably was/is a direct effect of the univeristy finalizing/deciding your aid package - which is why only accepted students get it, because only accepted students could have an aid package based on how much NYU wants them
This would mean its just a reflection of the data being processed - but it has also shown admission because no rejected students have their aid package processed and all the accepted students have it processed at some point </p>

<p>And of course admissions would deny it reflects anything because the decisions are supposed to not be released yet… They aren’t gonna be like “yeah that means your in but shhh dont tell anyone”</p>

<p>It goes back to last year’s decision cycle at least.
<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/14048962-post30.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/14048962-post30.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>Did any of you read NYU’s blog post today? It addresses this issue but not entirely clear. <a href=“MEET NYU - Home”>MEET NYU - Home;

<p>“College Confidential is truly the worst – and arguably the least reliable – so beware!”</p>

<p>omg I love it</p>

<p>Right on @Princess2013</p>

<p>I think it was a bad call on NYU’s part to even acknowledge CC in their news release. But if they are reading this thread I’d like to suggest not only fixing their little over sight on the FA status but also hiring a new egghead to redesign their unattractive (non user friendly) website.</p>

<p>coincidence that they made everyone’s albert “Award access not available.” and then he puts up that post? ;)</p>

<p>but why are they trying to cover it up so much? Admitting the mistake would put them in a much better light</p>