<p>Hahahahh I use stupid internet abbreviations and symbols in irony and then they slowly make their way into serious usage... it's terrible; I've got to get over that.</p>
<p>How about (-∞,3)? Lol, it's the nerdy version of <3. Interval notation ftw.</p>
<p>I couldn't vote so I'm neither happy nor disappointed. It's nice to see such a drastic change though.</p>
<p><em>Off-topic</em> So, which one of you is a girl? Poseur or Invoyable or INV? I'm sooo confused.
I read somewhere along the way about comments relating a "kitten" and now "lesbianism" to Poseur. So that's the prime suspect? :)</p>
<p>Oh. Actually I thought IV was a boy and Invoyable was a girl. +_+ Now it's all messed up.
Idk, seriously, lol. I've never seen a girl going "HAHAHAHAHA" so frequently on forums before. But it's funny and cool.
Heheh, sorry Invoyable for any damages caused ^^ And IV as well.</p>
<p>No, no, no, you have it all wrong. Invoyable and IV are the same person, who is really a fat (pardon me, flabby) smelly old male child-molester. The evidence for this postulate is incontrovertible, btw, so much so that I won't even bother listing it here...</p>
<p>1) Having honorably served in this country's military.
2) Not having terrorist, criminal, anti-American, anti-white, anti-Semitic friends.
3) Not having the MSM as his personal campaign machine.
4) Not facilitating donation fraud and voter fraud, which led to donation fraud and voter fraud. Go figure.
5) Not choosing a gaffe-a-minute VP who lies when pressed.
6) Not having zero experience.
7) Not being black.
8) Not withholding his academic record from the public
9) Not withholding his birth certificate from the American people
10) Having been vetted thoroughly
11) Not being a foreign policy moron
12) Not running on a vacuous slogan like "Yes, we can."
13) Not lying about accepting public financing
14) Not being a socialist
15) Not promising the worst economic plan since 1930
16) Not playing the race card a million times
17) Not flip-flopping for political expediency
18) Not having opposed the surge, the single biggest reason why we're about to win in Iraq
19) Not failing to support our troops by voting against funding them
20) By being the most qualified candidate by a f****** mile!</p>
<p>Braininahat:
1) Can you name one time that Obama played the race card?
2) Do you seriously not consider Sarah Palin a gaffe-a-minute VP? The one who couldn't name a single newspaper she read, thought Africa was a country, didn't know what the Bush doctrine was, spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on designer clothes for her and her children and spoke to a fake Nicholas Sarkozy on the phone for a half hour thinking it was the actual president? Who was not even allowed to speak at McCain's concession?
3) I'm curious what was bad about the economic policy in 1930 that allowed us to recover from the Great Depression?
4) Do you also consider Bill Clinton a socialist? Because Obama's policies are almost exactly the same as his. Also, what's more socialist than the Republican administration taking over the banks and giving billions of taxpayer dollars to bail out private business?
5) Did you watch McCain's campaign in 2000? Did you see the same McCain with the same issues as 08? Because he seemed to me to be a completely different (and far more conservative) person in his second campaign. What would you call that?</p>
<p>Etc, etc...there's so much more that could be said in response to your idiocy!</p>
<p>1) Can you name one time that Obama played the race card? </p>
<p>I'm pretty sure in Iowa he talked about "Legitimate Black Anger."
Also, he knows he got at least a quarter of his votes just because he was black. I don't think Obama wanted it that way, but I'm sure it happened.</p>
<p>Okay back to hacking the thread.... hahaha:</p>
<p>
[quote]
And, hm. Sounds like a long, personal story. ;]
[/quote]
HAHAH, yes [oh I just did the characteristic IV "HAHAHAHAH" lolol, didn't realize I did that so much...] it is quite long and very personal
: o</p>
<p>and HAH! That Poseur thinks Invoyable is a girl.. I think so too :]</p>
<p>
[quote]
No, no, no, you have it all wrong. Invoyable and IV are the same person, who is really a fat (pardon me, flabby) smelly old male child-molester. The evidence for this postulate is incontrovertible, btw, so much so that I won't even bother listing it here...
[/quote]
DON'T TELL EVERYONE!!!!! That was a secret... lol. And btw, all my other identities abound on this site, I'm all the mods, all the other posters, etc etc etc. I'm even doomster. Believe it or not! :] K my bell is about to ring and I need to go. lol.</p>
<p>
[quote]
I've never seen a girl going "HAHAHAHAHA" so frequently on forums before. But it's funny and cool.
Heheh, sorry Invoyable for any damages caused ^^ And IV as well.
[/quote]
HAHAHAHAHAHAH! Sorry, I do that subconsciously. I could always resort the infamous "lolololololol" < although I prolly do that quite a lot as well.. hahaha. Sorry.
Ah, and of course I forgive you for your HUUUGE gender-related mistake :]</p>
<p>I've always thought of the idea of voting for someone just because of race as absolutely ridiculous, but recently my friend brought up a good point: when you're electing a president, you're electing someone to represent YOU. If you are African American and feel that the African American voice needs to be heard more and vote for Obama JUST for that reason, there's actually some legitimacy to that.</p>
<p>^ And I think the results have proven that, more or less. All of a sudden, they become politically active.
@IV: LOL. Was it because my posts were too... polite??</p>
<p>^Hahaha, hmm, I dunno, probaby that, and also it says "Garland, TX" as your location and for some reason that seems really girly, lololol. So it was more subconscious reasoning on my part, haha.</p>