<p>It was .3% increase, I kept doing 1+.3 because I was used to big numbers when doing homework problems similar to this one :/</p>
<p>Was the second to last one eight and was the last one 3.8 or 4 something???</p>
<p>it said the pop. had a .3 percent increase (1.03) and just to check after the test, i multiplied 11.6 million times 1.03 25 times and got 109%</p>
<p>@jonny</p>
<p>thats what I did too but .3% is 1.003</p>
<p>Damn…</p>
<p>a .3 percent increase is 1.003, a 3 percent increase is 1.03 and the question asked for the percent of increase not the percent of change so it was obvious that 109% was wrong. I did it as 1.03 at first too but then I realized that 109% increase couldnt be right :p</p>
<p>damn! LOL well i got the percent one wrong then…</p>
<p>First probability question, 6!</p>
<p>?</p>
<p>@ro51092 yes</p>
<p>I got 109%, cuz the initial was something in the 10-20 something and the final was like 36 something so It was a more than 100% increase</p>
<p>so what do yall think about the root one i mentioned earlier…the one where f(x) and g(x) both have 2 distinct roots and h(x) = f(x) times g(x). how many possible roots does h have?
answers were like 2 only, 4 only, 2 or 3 or 4, etc.</p>
<ol>
<li>The one about prime numbers and n and 1 was the answer 8???</li>
</ol>
<p>One of the answers was 2 sin x?</p>
<p>@nikeboy3004 a 109% increase would mean the population doubled plus more.
yes one of the answers was 2sinx
@steelersngators I got 8 also and I think its right</p>
<p>i think its 2, because i plotted 2-3 different ones and i got 2 roots, but i think it could also be 2 or 4, not sure</p>
<p>@steelersngators</p>
<p>I got 8 as well. I did 3 * 3 * 3 * 5 and then just bruteforced all of the factors and ended up with 8.</p>
<p>Yea i got 2sinx fir the two triangles in the circle.</p>
<p>and it did lol :P</p>
<p>Does anyone remember if the question with the roots asked for how many distinct roots, or just how many real roots?</p>
<p>The prime numbers one I put 4. It said it was a number factored into 4 prime numbers, exactly 3 of which were the same. How many different factors, including n and 1, did it have.
Could be terribly wrong though >_></p>
<p>@randwulf.</p>
<p>correct. its 8. stupid question wasted like 2min of my time</p>