<p>anyone experience getting a lower score than expected when compared to the consolidated list? </p>
<p>was the score</p>
<p>54-800
53-770
52-750
51- 730
50- 700
49- 690</p>
<p>No idea if this is even close. Please input! (US test)</p>
<p>I think 50 was 710</p>
<p>hrmm. ok thanks.</p>
<p>no one else skeptical about their math score?!</p>
<p>i thought i got 800… but apparently i missed one and got a 770. Are you sure that -1 is 770? not -2? Just wondering. Cuz if I really missed 2, I’d be pretty mad.</p>
<p>I have NO IDEA how i got a 690 in math. and i thought i did pretty well for it. ARGH
the curve probably sucked. =(</p>
<p>not sure. Same andisaid, idk what messed me up. Anyone else?</p>
<p>-1 was a 770. I messed up on one question.</p>
<p>I think it was the dice question which screwed many people over.</p>
<p>I didn’t even take the test, and I spent a good portion of my Sunday afternoon tackling that dice problem with a friend who told me about it.</p>
<p>i got a 700</p>
<p>I’m not sure where it fits into the curve, but I got a 710. I wonder how many questions that was… hmm!</p>
<p>I got 800.</p>
<p>Judging from the recent trend in math curves, I’d say that:</p>
<p>54 800
53 770
52 750
51 730
50 710
49 700
48 690</p>
<p>I got a 700. I skipped at least 4, maybe 5. And I got the dice one wrong, and possibly the last question with the y=sinx graph.</p>
<p>1 less f ucking stupid mistake and I would’ve passed my target score (2250). CB really should allow a margin of 1 error for all SATs. A careless error doesn’t reflect one’s true math skills. Hell, I got 800 on Math II, which is tested in the same way as SAT math and a lot harder than it.</p>
<p>ryanxing’s curves seems right according to what people got. I don’t think i missed 5 questions though. I am gonna see on the 2nd and if it doesn’t match up i am going to get it verified. CB did delay many subject tests, so i wouldn’t see it beyond them to have an error here!</p>
<p>54-800
53-770
52-750
51-730
50-710
49-700</p>
<p>was the curve for sure. </p>
<p>This is a “green” level curve, so the cb clearly thought the test was quite easy.</p>
<p>R3d3mpti0n, wouldn’t that defy the whole purpose of a perfect score if you were allowed one error? Especially after the SAT recentering deal around 10 years ago, a perfect score is rarely indicative of a perfect performance.</p>
<p>According to dipole’s curve that would mean 5 wrong for 690. I see myself at most 3 or 4 wrong. hrmm.</p>
<p>I got -1 owned LOL.
And yea, -1 : 770 seems right; it didn’t seem too hard for me, but I apparently still messed up.
I think an 800 should mean you got a perfect score (or got -1 for some really hard test as in the '06 ones). Reading and Writing can be subjective which is why -1 is usually still an 800, but for Math, it’s either right or wrong/you know it or you don’t.</p>
<p>And, of course, the SAT tests how well you take the SAT and not how smart or dumb you are as a person.</p>