<p>Well, I know 12 was a choice because that was my answer.</p>
<p>How do you all think the Writing curve will be? -1 = 78 MC? I’m really hoping that -1/10 essay and -2/12 essay are 800s.</p>
<p>Well, I know 12 was a choice because that was my answer.</p>
<p>How do you all think the Writing curve will be? -1 = 78 MC? I’m really hoping that -1/10 essay and -2/12 essay are 800s.</p>
<p>I remember for the whale that i had to simplify a fraction. cant remember what fraction lol</p>
<p>Yea I remember simplifying it…it was like 40/320 or something along those lines…</p>
<p>yeah i got something like that. I know the humpback column had no “half-whales”</p>
<p>for the German chancellor and Margaret Thatcher was it “no error” or “earning” because it said The person… sciences, earning… Couldnt earning be ambiguous in whether it was referring to sciences or the chancellor?</p>
<p>Ugh yeah it was 12.
I just looked at my calculator.
I did get 15, but that’s because I multiplied by the hypotnues not height. ■■■</p>
<p>was the question z+2x+y=10, 2z+2x+2y=10 or was it z+2x+y=20, 2z+2x+2y= 20?</p>
<p>^ It was the first one, but I think z was w. And the answer was x = 5.</p>
<p>x=5 is correct.</p>
<p>By the way, this is cricket, if anyone remembers yesterday’s chat…</p>
<p>For the writing curve, I do think 12/-2 would be an 800. That’s the way it was when I took it in January and the difficulty was pretty similar, if not a little harder.</p>
<p>hey guys I’m sure you guys have talked about it but what did you think we’re the cr experimental sections? I had 4 and I had the passages
dinosaurs
‘Yo’
Greek
Kanzi
i might’ve mixed something up but any ideas?</p>
<p>^Those are all non-experimental.</p>
<p>Did you have 4 reading sections? That’s the only way you can have a reading experimental.</p>
<p>Was the secret heart passage experimental?</p>
<p>secret heart wasn’t experimental</p>
<p>No it was said that “there was popularity in 1961 and it wasn’t because of the physicists” then the question is what changed in 1961 he is implying that marketing changed nothing about yoyo changes happened with physicists. Approach it logically, how could a physicist make a change to the yoyo? He was make a hyperbole like statement to draw a parallel to the dinosaurs. The answer you chos was a big trick.</p>
<p>i had 3 reading sections:
something about creative writing, something about women suffrage and social welfare, something about dinos and yoyo, something about the greek alphabet, something about a dad and his daughter Yo, and a double passage on chimps.</p>
<p>@himichelle I think we had the same test.</p>
<p>was ur essay also on caring about other people of other nations? =p</p>
<p>how much did you guys write for the essay? every time i write a page and a half…i get like a 7 or 8 with two examples :/</p>
<p>Divy, that doesn’t make much sense. I’m sorry, but we’ll have to agree to disagree. First of all, it was 1951. And it the question asked what happened (or changed) between 1950 and 1951. It was a really tough question, but it appeared clear to me that the author was referencing the fact that new information about circular motion was discovered that did not affect the yo-yo’s popularity. Because it wasn’t blatantly stated, it was <em>implied</em> that physicists made some sort of discovery about how yo-yo’s worked during that period. I think that you, in fact, chose the trick answer (and if mine had been the “big trick” answer, many more people would have chosen it. Since they did not, it wasn’t a trick answer that fooled everyone. I think it was the right answer.). We’ll just have to wait for results to come out later.</p>
<p>I wrote a page and three quarters, and yes, I had the question about caring for people in other nations</p>