@RealMadrid07 Yeah 9 isn’t even, so you can’t use 54 as an example because 54 is six times an odd integer
Any more opinions about finding the origin vs offering a rationale?
Lets see I’m going to make predictions
Math: I’m going to guess I got 3 wrong. (720-730)
Critical Reading:I’m going to guess I got 15-16 wrong (610-620)
Writing:I’m going to guess I got 5-6 wrong with a 10 on the essay (690-700)
So I’m looking at a score around 2020-2050 I think.
Isn’t the answer 16?
(even #) times 6 divided by 8.
plug in.
8 times 16 is 128, then divide by 6, which is 21.3333 <— not even number.
**What was the full question?
This was likely one of the easier grammar questions but I just blanked: [country x] has more coastlines (than) America.
What answer was it for (than)? And was this an experimental section?
@ambitionsquared I said offering a rationale for a given method or whatever it was. The paragraph wasn’t the origin or history of Zen practices. It was describing how the breakdown of someone intellectually can lead to a revelation, and then the following paragraph compared how it actually played out in western civilization.
was it just me, or was the entire test so easy?
@ambitionsquared I don’t remember answering that grammar question but I could be blanking as well.
Did anyone have an experimental math grid-in section? Which one was it? Was it the one where the last question was about 3g(x)=f(3x)?
@fhgirl16 That question doesn’t sound familiar at all so that was likely the experimental section.
What about the grid in one where it said square root of y-3 = the square root of x-2 + x? Was it 7?
for zen do u guys remember the “total despair” question? like what was the significance of it or what it meant. i said it was a prelude to a breakthrough
@fhgirl16 I think I had that question but I don’t believe it was an experimental section. If it was the one with a graph of two lines that said something along the lines of what does g(x)=f(3) it was 1.5
@y0l0lsen I put prelude to breakthrough as well
@realmadrid7 I put 7 as well. However, for a second I thought that it could be 3. The question didn’t ask for the equation to be satisfied it just said what’s the lowest possible value. I thought I was over analyzing so I just went with 7
I got 1.5 on that one too @BornPrep
SAT October 3, 2015 Predictions
Sections
Writing: 730-770
Reading: 660-700
Math: 630-650
Composites
Low range: 2040
Mid-range: 2070
High range: 2120
Adjusted Extremes (Composites)
Low extreme: 1950
High extreme: 2120
Level of Certainty
Low range: 50%
Mid-range: 40%
High range: 25%
Low Extreme: 65%
High Extreme: 25%
Dismissive or incredulous
Inelegent for awkward not tense right???
Anyone need help about math answer?
I say origins. I cannot remember my rationale (HA), but I remember rationale did not really make any sense.
@BornPrep no I had that question too, but it was in a different section. This question didn’t even have a graph, it just gave you the equation. I am pretty positive it was experimental though, because none of my friends remember the question and I had two grid-in sections. Crossing my fingers because I completely bombed that section…