<p>What was the full sentence with the “such as”?</p>
<p>What was the motivation question? </p>
<p>@Snayyan Sorry, not color but it was something that wouldn’t change about bikes. </p>
<p>@wareagle I put no comma “such as” and “for example”</p>
<p>I got something "after sentence 3 " or “4” when you’re asking to split the paragraph in 2.</p>
<p>& I rearranged the paragraph so paragraph would be after paragraph 2? </p>
<p>Anybody???</p>
<p>I think it was after sentence 3, right after the final bike theft idea was mentioned.</p>
<p>What was the first and last questions? The first talked about the farmer directed the man. And the options were like “showed” or “by pointing”</p>
<p>The last question was talking about the hearing and which part in the passage the revision should be made to?</p>
<p>There is absolutely no way that “cars” should be introduced at the end. The entire passage is about bikes.</p>
<p>what was the answer for few species, little species one?</p>
<p>@SgtGutter</p>
<p>That’s exactly what I thought too, and I still hope it holds true. But saiyon said
“Back to the car question " although we aren’t going to see that happen, bikes are the most perferable transportation.” <- that’s how i remember it ending and that helps me conclude that the car quote would fit. But as usually, you can’t really decide because both sides have good agruments"</p>
<p>which actually makes some sense? im not sure</p>
<p>Few species</p>
<p>was it few species without the apostrophe?</p>
<p>I don’t remember the car question at the end exactly.</p>
<p>Do you remember the species question?</p>
<p>^^yes^^^^^^^^^^^few species no apostrophe</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure the bike passage never talked about cars at all.</p>
<p>sgtgutter, they were mentioning imporvements and the cars were an improvment and yes no apostrophe</p>
<p>@SgtGutter</p>
<p>That’s exactly what I thought too, and I still hope it holds true. But saiyon said
“Back to the car question " although we aren’t going to see that happen, bikes are the most perferable transportation.” <- that’s how i remember it ending and that helps me conclude that the car quote would fit. But as usually, you can’t really decide because both sides have good agruments"</p>
<p>which actually makes some sense? im not sure</p>
<p>Good explanation and thanks for remembering the quote. Cars would fit (high five!)</p>
<p>I know this is off-topic, but has anyone created a Reading thread?</p>
<p>yes me check it out!</p>
<p>the car sentence should not be included at the end. nowhere in the passage does it mention cars. i have seen many, many questions like this on practice tests and i am 100% sure it was no.</p>
<p>@SgtGutter</p>
<p>That’s exactly what I thought too, and I still hope it holds true. But saiyon said
“Back to the car question " although we aren’t going to see that happen, bikes are the most perferable transportation.” <- that’s how i remember it ending and that helps me conclude that the car quote would fit. But as usually, you can’t really decide because both sides have good agruments"</p>
<p>This persuaded me, how else did it lead up to although… The sentence before talked about new features such as wifi and gps. the next sentence talked about the cars improving etc</p>
<p>@Nickm56</p>
<p>I agree with you, but could you respond to my previous post? Saiyyon said you should include it due to the subsequent sentence.</p>