*OFFICIAL* 2012-2013 AP European History Thread

<p>the crimes was corporal punishment and public somehting or other i think</p>

<p>It was definitely sahkarov</p>

<p>Don’t want to spam this board, but just case in case no one saw it I was wondering if we had to address change over time in our DBQ…</p>

<p>The DBQ was not hard, but I only used 7 sources. It was a well done essay but I am worried that I did not use enough. What do you think?</p>

<p>^ 7 is fine for the basic core but you won’t be able to get the bonus core point for using almost of all of the documents. Overall, you can still get a 9 if you use 7/12 of the documents.</p>

<p>Everyone here seemed to breeze through the dpq, however I was struggling with grouping (into 3) and I was wondering what everyone else grouped their documents into?</p>

<p>Would getting a 9 be possible if I had 7 POVs, 12 documents, and a complex thesis? (And thanks for the info about the multiple choice questions!)</p>

<p>^ You don’t use pov in an apush dbq. Only world and euro. Unless you somehow worked outside information into it it, then it would work</p>

<p>This is the Euro thread</p>

<p>My experience:
Multiple choice was just annoying, but overall alright. I got some questions here and there wrong, but what ever. I think I did overall well.
For the DBQ, I was just really laidback in the first 45 minutes, and the time just flew by, lol. This being said, I went HAM at one point because by the time my proctor said that we should start the next essay, I was only halfway done with my DBQ. I used all 12 documents with POV’s for all of them. I also had 4 groupings.
For the essays, I think they were alright. I picked 3 and the infamous 7. I did the popular “misconception” for 7, but my teacher said it’s acceptable, so everyone needs to stop freaking out over the definitions in the question. (PS. I started my second essay right when they said that we should start doing the third one… I just came up soooo clutch.)
By the end of the test I couldn’t feel my hand AT ALL.
Anyways, I’m glad it’s over, and now it’s time to just review for state examinations and SAT II’s :).</p>

<p>Oh, whoops. Sorry about that, thought I was on the US thread. And of course that gives you a chance for a 9</p>

<p>does anybody remember the answer to the question that mentioned the irish rebellion, the baader-meinhof gang and the third I can’t really remember it might have been the basque revolt</p>

<p>BerBerBauBau I think they all used violence to achieve their goals.</p>

<p>oh good thats what I ended up choosing, thanks!</p>

<p>There was a dbq about treaty between sweden and holy roman empire for silesian protestant
Does that document support toleration? Also, did that happen after the defeat of Holy Roman Empire or Sweden?</p>

<p>@CalcBC, by “misconception” in #7, you mean accidentally going left rather than the instructed right, correct? Cause that’s what I did accidentally.</p>

<p>Just for clarification if in my DBQ i had three seperate paragraphs that used all documents and were three seperate ideas but i never once had a sentence that clearly said documents 4, 6, and 9, all support this idea in each paragraph it still counts as the three groupings that will get me the basic core point right?</p>

<p>You should never mention the documents directly as “Document X” or anything like that. Mention what the document contains but not the fact that it’s a document.</p>

<p>so then i didnt need that sentence thats what i originally thought however i had been getting conflicting messages from other people i took it with</p>

<p>ok guys, lets be honest. did anyone actually do the frq about art?</p>