The question with the taxi cab fare - piecewise function was incorrect, right?
Yea the parabola one was just crossing terms out
Guys is the giant tortoise question on writing section OBLIVIOUS?
in the brain essay, the question about the usage of italics for “some” was because he was making a distinction, right? not to show his emphatic support.
Thank you everyone for the cube question. I put 10; I just couldn’t remember the edge length. @glasshours Yes the piecewise function was incorrect. I believe it was E — the one with the steeper slope.
@glasshours you mean step function? by definition the question was a piecewise function
i got E
@16elir - Yes, distinction
I really doubt 3 wrong on math generally gives you a 700. That’s way too harsh.
Def incorrect
@debate4ever she felt like it didn’t give a window into who she was (or however they worded it)
does anyone know if they will cancel scores because of 20/25 minute thing? it is a big issue. is there any precedent?
@yousefk - Yeah, whoops
@glasshours yes, piecewise was incorrect.
@16elir im very curious on the 20/25 thing. anyone have any input?
@Chrysanthemum14 are none of you guys familiar with http://■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.com/sat-score-calculator/ lol
@16elir I had 25 minutes, too. I’m nervous about that
I said the italics thing was to underscore a point or something.
@16elir probably not, because we were supposed to listen to the proctor, and the proctor’s instructions were to give only 20 min despite it saying 25
@16elir
I think you are mixing up questions I don’t remember distinction or emphatic support as options.
I remember:
highlight a possible explanation, emphasize intense feeling, unusual usage…
Are we allowed to make a long post of all the questions and answers since docs aren’t allowed? Everyone would copy/paste the previous post
I think I put down underscore. Not sure about this one
@Chrysanthemum14 no, same problem, just mixed up wording. I was debating between show distinction (forget wording) and emphasize intense feelings, but settled on the former.