@Caltechdream lol i also said far tastier. definitely not far more tastier than
The question about which statement could support Van xxx’s suggestion was the hardest imo. What did you guys put for it?
@Caltechdream far tastier. Tastier has included “more”
@Caltechdream No, ‘far more tastier than’ seems redundant.
guys, stop talking so specifically about the test… you can get in trouble
@Caltechdream
No double positives are wrong
what did you guys put for the question where it asked what the passage supported about the participants by the time they took 13 draws?
I said they underwent physiological changes before each decision but I was torn between that or they confirmed their hunches
What did you guys put for the question about the thirteenth draw? The answer I had was like “it confirmed their previous hunches.”
Physiological changes, right?
Oh well looks like im retaking in october
I think I put they went under physiological changes for 13th draw?
I think it was by the 25th draw that they were certain/confirming their hunches.
I put physiological changes because it didn’t necessarily confirm their hunches.
I think the curve on math for this one will be as bad as the one I took in October…three wrong = 670. Bummer, because I specifically took this test to try to break 700. I omitted probably three and I got the grid in with A and B wrong.
Honestly guys the worst part about the SAT is right after it. Because you really want to know how well you did but you have to wait two weeks
What did you guys put for the contracts finding error question
More CR questions:
-Interacted with Pacific to support theory?
-Convivial -> something else?
I said physiological changes.
3 wrong in October was a 670?!
I think I changed my answer from physiological changes. 
Oh well. Only at -1
@glasshours i put convivial. there was another answer with festive and mournful but with everyone asking “WHY DIDNT YOU VISIT US SOONER?!?!?!” i felt that was more confrontational than mournful