Shouldn’t it be familial trait bc the entire family was like that
But just before, she was talking about how much they looked alike. And she said they had the same raucous laughter. So she’s emphasizing things the family shares.
How many omits and wrongs for a 700 in cr? I totally messed it up today, so pissed
How many each section to get 2100+? Wrong and omit
I feel that this SAT was way easier then the March one I took a while ago. Got a 1980 last time, and hoping for a t least 2100.
The only reason I did poorly, to my standards, was because my first time I thought the page said stop on two sections, and so I ended up not doing like two whole pages of questions on the reading sections.
Yeah the 57 wasn’t experimental. The answer was 2.
It was 100% familial trait. She said they all shared the same raucous laughter even though they hadn’t previously met.
@DonQixote
Yes answer was 2.
What did you guys get for the math questions where it was a%/b and the one with j and k?
“…is amazed by our physical likeness. We laugh the same raucous laughter, despite the fact that we have never previously met.”
If you’re family, then you might have the same distinct laughter, regardless of whether or not you’ve been around them. I guess the implication here is that if you’re around someone who laughs a certain way, it might be contagious. And “personal” quirk contradicts the passage since personal means “of, affecting, or belonging to a particular person rather than to anyone else,” rather than being shared by her family.
Only 2&3 @lolalollipop
@lolalollipop II and III only. Both II and III were equal to .01ab.
Hey everyone, I saw that some of you were debating about the answer to a question that I never recall seeing. It was a question in the gut feeling passage, in which the answers dealt with predicting the amount of good/bad draws or something like that? Some people said they are equal, others that there would be more bad draws. Anyways, I don’t remember those answers at all, so does anyone remember the question?
I think it was what can be inferred from the passage
@TheNintendoChip - I think the correct answer to that question was that they wouldn’t have a change in their physics state. The question was along the lines of “What can you conclude about the second group of ‘patients?’” Can anyone confirm?
57th term was 2?
@curlypie99 Yeah same here. I’m still not entirely sure if I understand what a “canoe ladder” is…
I was really happy with the other passages though, for the most part. Especially the one about American textbooks.
@DonQixote I put j+k too… I think I used -2 and -4 as dummy answers.
^I had j+k as well
For the American textbook passage, what did you guys put for the reason for the “interjection”? I think I said convey “erroneous” tone or something like that. (since it was for mocking purpose I felt like)
“Testing irregularities refer to problems
with the administration of a test. When they occur, they may affect an individual or groups of test-takers. Such problems
include, without limitation, administrative errors (e.g., improper timing, improper seating, defective materials, and defective
equipment); improper access to test content; and other disruptions of test administrations (e.g., natural disasters and other emergencies). When testing irregularities occur, ETS may decline to score the test, or cancel the test score. When it is
appropriate to do so, ETS gives affected test-takers the opportunity to take the test again as soon as possible, without charge.”
We may have to retest because of the defect. I really hope not.