***Official 2015 June SAT (US Only) THREAD***

@donquixote - me too. They’re both negative.

@TaterSabre Well, if we can retake the same test, I think it’d be a bit too overpowered XD… I’m pretty happy with this test, though, so merp.

Yeah I think the timing problem is going to be pretty widespread, if they really did print the books wrong.

@Chrysanthemum, everyone’s 25 minute (that should’ve been 20 minute) was the last reading section, but people either had it section 8 or 9. Some people in my testing room had that section in section 8 but I had it section 9.

a% of b = b%of a

I substituted a for 50 and 100 for b

anyone have one about why the hawaiin canoes were mentioned? I said it was to disprove a future objection to her theory but im starting to think it was something else

For the 57th term it was 2. I actually counted to 57 after realizing that the pattern repeats.

I put self-evident instead of erroneous or misguided. @Newdle

@jkates I thought that it had something to do with the second group (the ones without the decision making part of the brain). I think that the answer I put for that was something along the lines of the fact that they would have the change in physical state, but were unable to detect/notice it. Thank you all.

@Newdle I also thought the second paragraph was almost sarcastic, so I put that the interjection demonstrated that the author felt the preceding information was erroneous.

@TaterSabre As much as I would like to have a free test, I cannot afford to do so, as this was my third time taking the SAT and I really only did it to improve my reading score (which happened to be the section that was affected, hooray.)

I put self-evident.

Yeah it was j+k

I said that j = -2 and k = -1.
Meaning j+k = -3

@studenthelp2734 I think I also said that.

@Chrysanthemum14 You can notice that %=.01, which can be associative. However the one with (2ab) whatever wouldn’t work because you’re adding a 2 in there.

@studenthelp2734 That’s what I put. She was disproving a possible objection that the huge statues would be too heavy for a canoe.

what did people get for the one that was like “which statement would prove van whatever’s hypothesis of canoe ladders”

For the erroneous vs self-evident, my reasoning was… Because it was asking for the PRIMARY REASON behind using an interjection, it can’t be self-evident. The author wouldn’t want to say that was “self-evident,” but rather stupid. It’s like sarcastic, which I think is closer to erroneous.

for the adopted girl passage was the door handle ornate?

I thought it was self-evident because the statement right before it was “the people of American affect it’s future”

(We’re talking about the history textbook one right)

@naybay101
No. She was just dreaming of what the door knob actually looked like which is why it looked different every time.

i think it was “misguided” because it /is/ true, but since it was also sarcastic, the author was saying the textbook was using the quote in a twisted way, therefore a misguided way

Was the one about the good/bad draws versus physical state changes #19? I remember finally deciding on C for that one, but I can’t remember which answer that was. It was C or D.