<p>@GranTurismo330 That was talking about how we like food that is “familiar” - so they took foods that were familiar and then mixed them with new flavors (hence the “assimilation”). I don’t think that concept, overall, can be described as “traditional” - I’d say it has to do with cultures and different tastes.</p>
<p>@canunot #'s like that are often ignored… like it definitely looks prime but nobody cares about the number 13 LOL… fml</p>
<p>was the very last question on the section 10 writing D? i think you had to change the tense of glaciers so that it was plural, and switch the order of “not only” right?</p>
<p>360+45-180</p>
<p>Triangle Exterior Sum Theorem. All exterior angles add up to 360 degrees. 360 - 135 = 225</p>
<p>180-45 = 135 then 360-135</p>
<p>I believe it was “social and cultural implications from a biological phenomenon.” But not everyone had this section was it experimental?</p>
<p>@GranTurismo330 But that paragraph with all the spices had to do with the different ways that cultures used the biological construction of foods to their benefit - they used them to develop their own unique cuisines. That’s definitely a cultural thing. </p>
<p>Yes, it was “not only constitute” since it was plural and the second clause was “but also provide”, so you have to keep it parallel and switch the not only to come before the verb.</p>
<p>Was the purpose of the green chemistry passage c) to provide an overview or something like that?</p>
<p>On of the easy questions i forgot what a parallelogram was lol but remembered I had a ti84</p>
<p>On the paragraph corrections, how would the second paragraph be most improved? by adding a quote or discussig how the colors of drinks were changed?</p>
<p>Adding a quote. </p>
<p>i put how the drinks were changed</p>
<p>@firered777 yea i put that</p>
<p>Sample size is what I put</p>
<p>Because how could it be valid if the experiment was ran on like 2 people</p>
<p>I didn’t put adding a quote…
Anyone remember other choices for that one?</p>
<p>What’s the refrigerator answer?</p>
<p>And the assimilate vs traditionalism. If they used familiar material to make a new dish, isnt it still traditionalism?</p>
<p>I put how drinks were changed from the experiment did in line 6…i don’t see how adding a quote would be beneficial at all</p>