<p>I’m trying to recall something ambiguous from the large writing section. Anyone have any problems there?</p>
<p>The point of those types of questions is not to add any new information - to stick to the main point of the paragraph. The purpose of the experiments was not to discuss how they changed the color of the drinks. It was about how the appearance of food affects consumer’s perception of it. </p>
<p>Did anyone remember what they put the aunts personality was like and the evidence? This was in the critical reading section were this girl had a aunt who visited America for some business relations I think</p>
<p>Did anyone have a writing section about the egg industry because I had two 35-question writing sections, and I’m guessing that one was the experimental. </p>
<p>@Woandering it said “novel” dish. I put assimilation. They’re mixing the familiar tastes of their cuisine, or rathing imposing it, on the other novel dish to make it to their liking</p>
<p>@student0011 it was talking about the results, not adding a quote</p>
<p>@ncccc1701 yea i know that the point was to discuss the perception of the consumer, but the only way that anyone can know what the perception was to discuss what the outcome was.</p>
<p>@colestech I think that’s your experimental section. Those with separate questions for evidence are for 2016 only</p>
<p>egg industry was experimental i got that one </p>
<p>A quote from a scientist involved in the experiment would provide more insight as to what the results were and how he/she interpreted them</p>
<p>@ncccc1701 right but i think the prob with that paragraph was that they didn’t say anything about how the sodas were altered (like not even that their colors were changed)</p>
<p>I’m sure it is deprived of so no error</p>
<p>Google doc anyone</p>
<p>@GranTurismo330 </p>
<p>That’s not true assimilation though. Plus, the novel material isn’t even necessarily part of another culture.</p>
<p>@nccc1701, ok now you’re just messing with us</p>
<p>@wizKhalif I’m confused as to how discussing the logistics of how they changed the drinks’ colors helps achieve that?</p>
<p>Was it? Will I like those kind of passages so much better</p>
<p>It wasn’t deprived of. I distinctly remember asking myself “you are not DENIED of your rights; you are DEPRIVED of them, or you are DENIED them.”</p>
<p>I’m almost sure it was assimilation.</p>
<p>@nccc1701, if we don’t know how it was altered, we can’t be for sure that it was altered VISUALLY. </p>
<p>Adding a quote is superficial since he gave 3 different studies/experiments, Saying that “the soft drinks were altered in color” would reinforce his supporting evidence </p>