<p>I meant more along the lines of get a full read at committee and have actual debate over the fate of the applicant. There are bound to be a lot of folks who will be rejected off the bat and some that will accepted just as quickly. It’s that middle ground that matters. I’m assuming that there’s a lot more debate around SCEA applicants (especially since every SCEA admit is almost certainly an admit who will come to Harvard) since they won’t have seen the entire applicant pool.</p>
<p>@GordonTheGekko:
These dates were set before applications started coming in. The AdCom does have an idea of how many people/quality of applicants from past SEAC rounds, but that’s at least some 3 years ago, so I wouldn’t read too much into the meaning of how long the committee rounds are. </p>
<p>Also, keep in mind, many applicants are deferred, and they’ll be reconsidered in the RD round…</p>
<p>Any idea of when we’ll have some hard numbers to over-analyze? >w<
I saw Duke’s press release a few days back; apparently the numbers were better than in years past. It will be interesting to see how things shake out among the Ivies.</p>
<p>My interviewer gave me the impression that NO ONE was rejected in the EA round. He kept telling me that if I don’t get in early, I’d be re-considered in the RD round (I didn’t ask if they rejected people because I was scared of the answer… ;))</p>
<p>GordonTheGekko, I am confused. Won’t they deny you if they don’t think you will get in during the early round? Also, I am headed to a wedding this week, so am I missing out on potential interview times?</p>
<p>Is it true that even if there are alumni in the area who are available to interview, only some applicants get interviews (like those who are completley unqualified don’t get one?)</p>
<p>Also, anyone know how many people applied SCEA? Or… how many CCers?</p>
<p>Do you guys think we should post our stats (with the format of the last Harvard decision results thread) and get feedback on our chances on this thread? I think it’d be kinda fun to see if what people predict actually turn out to be correct or not! :D</p>
<p>Haha why not. My interview is on Thursday with a marketing VP nearby. I’m on my phone so format may be funky.</p>
<p>SAT- 2290 (780 CR, 710 M, 800 CR)
AP- 5’s on all (world, ush, lang, psych)
SAT 2- 750 lit 780 world 800 us 800 latin
GPA - 4.0 uw 4.391 w
12th classes- AP Enviro, AP lit, AP Vergil, AP Calc BC, AP euro, AP combined us and comp gov, journalism 4</p>
<p>EC- mostly tutoring /teaching and classics related. Taught Greek to classmates, independently translate old AP syllabus, Pres of latin club and latin honor society, eic of paper. Tae kwon do competition team.Captain of latin quiz bowl team.
Awards - perfects on national latin exam, medals and commendations on dozens of classics test and at njcl and vjcl conventions including best in show for latin dramatic interpretation and latin sight reading.
Also lots of first place finishes for tkd in state</p>
<p>Other:
Hispanic male from El Salvador (but international since I have no green card so not a urm ), $60,000 income for house
Essays about conveying gratitude to my hardworking dad through academics (all six people who’ve read it have cried lol) and about working hard for latin despite the air of intellectual apathy at my school.</p>
<p>Rec - latin teacher (very good), lang teacher (may be good or generic - same goes for counselor )</p>
<p>Eh… I don’t really see the point of posting stats because practically every Harvard SCEA’er here is guaranteed to have excellent numbers. The tie-breakers will really be ECs and essays.</p>
<p>Calgirl, I strongly disagree. I have already seen many threads about applicants who have submitted their stuff but are worried about their stat. I am one of those people, actually. Regardless, the whole subjective business is why I suggested this :)</p>
<p>Interficio, I would predict an acceptance! It’s really great that you show a passion for Latin. Does this correlate to what you want to study in college as you have indicated on the supplement? Also, the fact that you’re relatively low-income will help. </p>
<p>In the future, let’s use this format:</p>
<p>Objective:
•SAT I (breakdown):
•ACT:
•SAT II:
•Unweighted GPA (out of 4.0):
•Rank (percentile if rank is unavailable):
•AP (place score in parenthesis):
•IB (place score in parenthesis):
•Senior Year Course Load:
•Major Awards (USAMO, Intel etc.):</p>
<p>Thanks! Who knows what they’ll do with my international status. From my research, Harvard and Princeton care the least but it will definitely hurt and possibly guarantee a rejection when it comes to Stanford. The other downside are the other stronger classicists who I know are applying. Oh well, I’ve done all I could! Wish me luck for Thursday’s interview </p>
<p>This chancing idea has already been done before, and it was in the following thread (started by 1987Crimson, who is a Harvard alum and interviewer and who could probably speak more accurately for Harvard’s admissions than its own applicants):</p>
<p>**You can keep your identity confidential by generalizing, as I have, if you prefer.</p>
<p>Objective:
•SAT I (breakdown):
•ACT: 31
•SAT II: Chem-770 Math II-770
•Unweighted GPA (out of 4.0): 4.0
•Rank (percentile if rank is unavailable): 8/323 (yeah, I know. I switched schools, so the first part of my transcript doesn’t have as many challenging courses Hopefully, they’ll understand)
•AP (place score in parenthesis): 5-bio 4-us, english, chem,stat 3-spanish
•IB (place score in parenthesis):
•Senior Year Course Load: 6 AP and a junior-year science class at a community college
•Awards:
-National AP Scholar with Distinction
-National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory’s summer program scholar
certified in Laboratory Biohazard Safety
-many high school/ state university community service and honor roll awards
State Science Bowl, Third place
Science olympaid, 2nd at regionals, overall 3rd at regionals, 6th at state
Math competitions- 10th, 5th, and 4th place
Health Occupation Students of America National Leadership Conference, second place<br>
^state- 3rd and 5th regionals- 1st (x2)
Winner of the “Published writer: Creative Communication’s Poets Contest”
Published writer in A Celebration of Poets</p>
<p>Subjective:
•Extracurriculars (place leadership in parenthesis): Researcher at the state University; Science club; Six other math/science clubs(founder of 1, co-founder of 1; president of 2; secretary of 1; vice president of 1; set up a sponsorship with a national organization for the field of science I’m interested in, so now interested students have new opportunities for involvement in this field; set up my school’s sience tutoring program)many volunteer hours and awards from these clubs; ______cultural association(on the organization committee at the state university); summer camp for kids interested in learning about cultures(co-founder/ counselor); Freshman and New Students(mentor since 10th grade) SGA(senior class president; class rep junior and senior year); NHS (vice-president)
•Job/Work Experience: Private Bio tutor (1 sem.)
•Volunteer/Community service: ~250 hours (highlights: translated Spanish letters from South America for a non-profit scholarship program, volunteered at many cultural events, tutored Spanish and mathematics.
•Summer Activities: Research program at MSU; Nationals for HOSA; tennis
•Essays: good
•Teacher Recommendation: 1 good, 1 glowing (from the teacher who asked me to tutor her daughter in bio)
•Counselor Rec: pretty good. Talk to her everyday.
•Additional Rec: from mentor. Hopefully really good
•Interview: we’ll see :D</p>
<p>Other
•State (if domestic applicant): Kentucky
•Country (if international applicant):
•School Type: Public
•Ethnicity: Middle-eastern
•Gender: Female
•Income Bracket: ~90,000? not sure.
•Hooks (URM, first generation college, etc.):</p>
<p>Reflection
•Strengths: focus in sciences; passion for spreading cultural awareness
•Weaknesses: SCORES and class rank.</p>
<p>I meant that you should peruse that thread and see what kinds of numbers he said would make the applicants academically qualified for Harvard. Judging from what he said there, you would definitely be qualified. Your ECs are impressive too.</p>
<p>EDIT: Adding a quote from what 1987Crimson said:</p>