<p>How'd you think it was?</p>
<p>Yeah I took M... it was fine. As expected.</p>
<p>I was a bit puzzled with the last question..</p>
<p>what was it?</p>
<p>oh i thought it was already</p>
<p>Yeah, M was very easy up until the last question. I can't say, I have to wait until 10 AM Pacific time.</p>
<p>whens that</p>
<p>IvyLeagueORbust, how was it in comparison w/ our May one?</p>
<p>Pentasa, you didn't miss out--well sort of. The test seemed more basic, but nevertheless there were some obscure questions. All in all, you would have done better. Still, I took this exam without studying/reviewing as I did during AP week for AP bio. I guess I'll just have to wait and see.</p>
<p>I took the E section.</p>
<p>fabrizio, how'd you fair on the exam?</p>
<p>i am insanely angry because the test had hardly no questions regarding organismal biology and this was the section that i studied the freakin hardest....there was like nothing on what the pancreas, liver, thyroid, gall bladder, stomach, esophagus, etc do....The test contained alot of more general questions and some difficult lab samples. I read the entire princeton review prep book for this and i found it to be more than enough except for a few questions that you can use logical reasoning to solve. If princeton review was adequate to study for this test then i would believe that reading the entire barrons book to study for this test is entire overkill. I looked at the barrons prep book after i was finished with the PR one and it was so so so comprehensive. Too comprehensive in fact</p>
<p>I know!! What was with all them lab and graph questions!?!?</p>
<h2>Um, the test talked about hormones; the test talked about organs; the test talked about anatomy of various organisms; the test also had a great deal of plant questions as well. I felt the examined was more evenly proportioned than the may exam.</h2>
<p>However, the lab questions were overkill.</p>
<p>yeah there were WAY too many lab/graph questions, I feel the same exact way diamond, in terms of the fact that there were hardly any organismal biology.</p>
<p>For future bio takers, dont put much emphasis on studying all the organismal biology stuff and theres no need to use the barrons book, honestly. Princeton Review along with your own Biology textbook is all you need. I have never looked at Kaplan's bio prep book but i assume that it will be in the middle of the comprehensitivity chart between PR and Barrons and will also be abit of an overkill. I took the Ecology section and i found it to be much easier than molecular. Ecology doesnt require much calculation but you need to now the standard terms and cycles in it.</p>
<p>^do not say that diamond, they change the test EVERY time, sometimes it is filled with organismal, sometimes it is filled with lab/graph, and other times it is lots of ecology. Future bio sat ii takers should study ALL subjects.</p>
<p>Diamond, I'd edit your post. I don't think were suppose to talk about questions yet. Wait, can we though?</p>
<p>indian, form the post you had earlier; We're allowed to discuss answers now.</p>
<p>i'm going to list some of the parts of questions i remember: protein 2ndary structure, sulfur dixoide = acid rain, higher plants, nuclear membrane, amoeba, coffee, 30,000 genes= proteins, fish=2 hearts, cytochrome, hybrid normal father, placenta, pcr etc... </p>
<p>NJ science league helped a ton.</p>
<p>what was the answer for the placenta and the amoeba questions?</p>