<p>ok. I'm in the same boat as you narcissa. Some people say that the need not one had an error because it should of been needs not. Please convince me otherwise.</p>
<p>No, Silver, it doesn't need a correction because need is a modal verb/aux verb there which does not change with regard to singular/plural subjects (I got this wrong :'( )</p>
<p>i thought it was alright overall .. writing was the easiest section for sure, except for the one weird one about quinn taking dan to someone's house or whatever ... i put E initially and then changed it to D because i thought it should have said </p>
<p>"quinn took dan to don's house for a visit, never imagining that it would be five years before he would see him again" </p>
<p>instead of</p>
<p>"quinn took dan to don's house for a visit, never imagining that it would be five years before seeing him again"</p>
<p>because it never said who was seeing who ? and that kind of threw me off .. and i figured since there was the "it would be" conditional part of the sentence, you would need to finish the sentence in conditional as well..but maybe im totally off here.</p>
<p>yeah i put no error for that one too .. need not is correct
everyone's been talking about the spate/paucity one .. i put spate because ive heard the term spate erosion before but im not sure what the sentence was</p>
<p>The sentence was about scientists speculating about erosion due to the _____ of craters on Venus. The correct answer was paucity, which means scarcity. I omitted that one.</p>