<p>"The Verbal section with 3 short passages WAS NOT experimental. Every single person had this section. You either had the Quantitive Comp/Grid-Ins (the 2nd one was experimental) or the verbal section with a passage about Nixon (I'm not sure what questions it had, I just know I didn't have this section)."</p>
<p>Uhm, I had neither a section on Nixon nor a second quantcomp/gridin. And I had an extra verbal section.</p>
<p>I had 3 verbal passages, just one comp/grid-ins.....however, I do not remeber having a Nixon one...</p>
<p>All sections were normal in the one I took.. no difference at all.. except the 3 short passages section.. so how can u conclude that it was NOT experimental? it may be or may be not.. not all get the same experimental section right..</p>
<p>hey franklinbrown, did your extra verbal section have short passages and a mini dual passage? Because I had that for experimental.</p>
<p>I had the Nixon passage...and that was a passage on the Nov 03 test. So, doesn't that mean it was experimental then and real now?</p>
<p>I had no Nixon passage, so it can't be real. Just because they used along time ago doesn't mean its real, although it does seem pointless.</p>
<p>slipstream do you remember if that blueprint:structure question was in the chimp section?</p>
<p>sorry, but i have absolutely no idea...i'm lucky if I can remember the questions at all</p>
<p>How would I know if its extra! I thought it was experimental but I don't know. </p>
<p>It had two pages with three short passages, one about chimps, another about the Spanish language, and another about a smooth traveller with a club soda.</p>
<p>I don't see why they would do an experimental section one year ago and then make it experimental again...seems like a waste of experimentation</p>
<p>franklinbrown, did you have a mini dual passage in your experimental verbal?????????</p>
<p>What do You think will be the score on math with one error?
770?</p>
<p>What do you mean by a "mini dual passage"?</p>
<p>And by experimental are you referring to the one with short passages (chimps, spanish, suave traveller)?</p>
<p>no</p>
<p>mini dual passage = 2 passages about clocks</p>
<p>I had nothing about clocks.</p>
<p>Or Nixon.</p>
<p>jpsi, this is not the PSAT. 1 wrong will be 800 or 790.</p>
<p>franklinbrown, the chimps + spanish was NOT experimental, you said so yourself.
I can't believe i'm the only one, but did anyone have a double passage, you know with questions comparing the two, except instead of large like the last section with the hiker, it is small like the chimp passage.</p>
<p>thank you vitamin1. for answering my questions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>experimental, i always felt, it tends to be easier and weird problems that u never could imagine to appear on the SAT.............so i guessed the mini passages is the experimental part......plus the analogies of that section was easier than the other ones.</p>
<p>ok just wanna make sure about the verbar sections and what they contained</p>
<p>VERBAL 35Q: chimps
spanish ppl
suave guy OR jewelry?????</p>
<p>VERBAL 35Q:twinkle twinkle star astronomers
watchmakers-dual passage</p>
<p>VERBAL 30Q:korean girl???</p>
<p>is this right?</p>
<p>"franklinbrown, the chimps + spanish was NOT experimental, you said so yourself."</p>
<p>When did I say that?!</p>