<p>Can someone predict the curve for this SAT?</p>
<p>I just took international one today and i had total of 4 math sections so one math was probably dummy. However im reading here that people got reading as an experimental section. So is the US one and international one different?</p>
<p>tanzim</p>
<p>I said comprehensive.</p>
<p>aubdem </p>
<p>Everyone gets a different exp section. This is for internationals.</p>
<p>do you remember tha one of the last 4 questions of Error Identification was E. It might be 27, or 28.</p>
<p>Oh can someone explain the math question about line graph w+x , w+z. How u got the solutions…? I had 10 extra minutes and somehow couldnt wrap my head around it.</p>
<p>in math</p>
<p>one question: the arithmetic series questions,2 times the number preceding minus 5 and fifth term to sixth term difference 5…i don’t remember the question but I chose 20
is that the right one??</p>
<p>there was no e in the last the 3 e comes in the beginning 17-e
13-e
23-e</p>
<p>everyone’s saying after line 11 but I thought it was line 9. I guess I made a mistake on that one. And what was the answer to that identifying error question about a girl and and her friend both winning a science project or something?</p>
<p>@alexbcn yup 8th-7th=45-25=20</p>
<p>the line is like a x-axis of xy coordinate. So you need to find the 0 point. Once you find it is very easy</p>
<p>@Toughman
Yeah I said more comprehensive as well. But some are saying that its "more problematic " although I don’t find it logical.</p>
<p>I answered more problematic cause it wasnt as easy to research as back where she lived.
They were more complex to deal with and couldnt easily identify the instects. I ccant see how its comprehensive.</p>
<p>Improving Paragraphs:
Place immediately after sentence 9
In contrast
People today are less influenced by the Meteorite instrument or whatever. (because it does say that the mapmaking technique was very old, and the other choices didn’t fit in).
Delete from passage.
Remove “Nevertheless”…</p>
<p>Can someone confirm?</p>
<p>the venn diagram thing with the prime number and multiples of 5 sets.
was it 1 posible number? (only 5,right)</p>
<p>and the other prime number question
was it only divisble by 2? or also st?</p>
<p>the electeic charges graph. was it C or A?</p>
<p>@ccuser001 I have the same thing.</p>
<p>What was the ratio between the sides of the 2 triangles in the what is the perimeter of the largest triangle question? Was it 1:5(smaller to bigger)??</p>
<p>nope it was 2:1</p>
<p>@ccuser001 Yes. I got the same answers with yours. Did you remeber the last one?</p>
<p>I think I blew the CR section.
SC is not hard this time IMO.</p>
<p>For the unconverted question: I thought unconverted meant those who still listen to classical music, and immediately following that sentence the author basically wrote that, people who feel superior because they listen to classical music make little headway with the unconverted, because they don’t understand music should be considered good just because they are worth loving. So I thought maybe the unconverted are the people who like classical music because they truly love it. So I chose anxious fans. That’s probably incorrect since no one here chose the same answer.</p>
<p>For the “problematic” question I chose comprehensive because the study relies on side knowledge of anatomy. That’s probably wrong as well…</p>
<p>Also for the classical music passages, I chose: Passage 1 regards Passage 2 as a emotional reaction to music instead of a cerebral one. Because passage 2 is saying how music is very personal and passage one is analyzing why classical music is on a shaky ground in America. Still, I might be wrong…</p>
<p>Oh and the casual glance one: I put spontaneous (dan it). Because a casual glance at the butterflies could mean that it was done without previous planning – an on-the-spot action as opposed to a planned observation which would enable the observer to see the nuance.</p>
<p>Ahhh… I have an ominous feeling about CR…</p>