<p>entropy always increases
so by 2nd law of thermodynamics</p>
<p>you can't build an animal (which is ordered) out of a mere single cell.</p>
<p>my god, i found the rebuttal! it could only be divinely inspired. i'm smart</p>
<p>what about human babies they develop from a single cell right</p>
<p>your argument is crap lol…i really hope you’re kidding.</p>
<p>You need to understand what entropy means first and then you’ll see why it’s always increasing even when babies are growing up in orderly fashion – or even if you put one in a blender…</p>
<p>But I prayed to God and He told me that evolution doesn’t exist. He is so powerful. He will love you if you let Him love you. </p>
<p>And Bush believes that intelligent design should be taught. I think Bush has a good point. It won’t be taught if it isn’t right.</p>
<p>^ ROFLMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo</p>
<p>PKswmr76, what does roflmao mean? would you like to hear the gospel?</p>
<p>…Joke?</p>
<p>Either way, your concept of entropy (and evolution, to be honest) is flawed.</p>
<p>I know all about entropy</p>
<p>Quantitatively, entropy is defined by the differential quantity dS = δQ / T, where δQ is the amount of heat absorbed in an isothermal and reversible process in which the system goes from one state to another, and T is the absolute temperature at which the process is occurring.[6] Entropy is one of the factors that determines the free energy of the system. This thermodynamic definition of entropy is only valid for a system in equilibrium (because temperature is defined only for a system in equilibrium), while the statistical definition of entropy (see below) applies to any system. Thus the statistical definition is usually considered the fundamental definition of entropy.</p>
<p>When a system’s energy is defined as the sum of its “useful” energy, (e.g. that used to push a piston), and its “useless energy”, i.e. that energy which cannot be used for external work, then entropy may be (most concretely) visualized as the “scrap” or “useless” energy whose energetic prevalence over the total energy of a system is directly proportional to the absolute temperature of the considered system. (Note the product “TS” in the Gibbs free energy or Helmholtz free energy relations).</p>
<p>In terms of statistical mechanics, the entropy describes the number of the possible microscopic configurations of the system. The statistical definition of entropy is the more fundamental definition, from which all other definitions and all properties of entropy follow. Although the concept of entropy was originally a thermodynamic construct, it has been adapted in other fields of study, including information theory, psychodynamics, thermoeconomics, and evolution.[7][8][9]</p>
<p>==
See. I’m smart!</p>
<p>Then whats roflmao ?
(smile-if your not kidding…rolling on the floor, laughing my ass off)</p>
<p>Or, you know how to copy and paste off of Wikipedia!!!</p>
<p>Ask me more questions. I have all the answers to your questions on evolutiong!</p>
<p>hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa wow…i really needed this.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>owned. :)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>owned :)</p>
<p>"owned. "</p>
<p>-wth?</p>
<p>Haha well… people who use that 2nd law of thermodynamics argument have obviously never ever taken a basic thermodynamics course in college and have a very crude (at best) understanding of entropy</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>ur argument has flaws
(a) it assumes that a basic thermodynamics course in college will automatically immunize people against supposed idiocy when in reality, some ppl who take the course will not absorb anything
(b) it also assumes that the people who use that 2nd law of thermodynamics argument automatically have a very crude understanding of entropy based on the mere fact that they invoked the argument. supposedly misinformed arguments are not mutually exclusive with a comprehensive understanding of entropy. after all they could do the mathematics of entropy
(c) thermodynamics courses rarely encourage the student to generalize their conclusions to complex adaptive systems. transfer of knowledge is usually rare</p>
<p>Moreover, Lord Kelvin was one of the pioneers of thermodynamics. And he invoked thermodynamics arguments to support his arguments against evolution
</p>
<p>this thread is funny :-D</p>
<p>ur mom is funny</p>
<p>lol GOOD ONE… -_-</p>