I’m originally from California. I didn’t get accepted into my dream school (UCLA), so I decided to SIR to UW since they gave me a bit of money, I thought I would thrive there, and my parents didn’t want me to end up at a CC (they paid a s-ton of money for private school and didn’t want it to go to waste). Turns out I’m not, and I don’t really like it here. My current plan is to stay at UW and work my butt off for two years, since their pre-med program is still really good, try to get research and internship positions, and then transfer to UCLA. I know that my chances of transferring to UCLA from an OOS school is basically slim to none, and if I just go back to CC it would make it much easier for me to transfer. But I’m hesitant to do that since UW still gives me more opportunities for research/internships, and my final goal is to get into an in-state med school, since UW’s med school really only accepts students from the Pacific Northwest (preferably DGSOM).
My main question is: does it make more sense to:
-
stay at UW for four years, fork over $200k and not enjoy my undergrad years, get internships and acquainted with professors, and then apply to a CA med school as an out-of-state student,
-
stay at UW for two years, fork over $100k, and then take a crapshoot at transferring to UCLA where it’s cheaper (and it’s still my dream school), then apply to a CA med school as an in-state student,
or 3) transfer back to a CC for two years, transfer to UCLA, then apply to a CA med school as an in-state student?
Fiscally, I know #3 is the best option, but I’m lucky enough that my parents are paying for my undergrad. I feel like #1 and #2 will give me the best chance of getting into med school. What’s the best course of action here?