Usually they use “blind” admissions to mean “need blind” admissions, they don’t take into account the person’s need for financial aid.
UF’s AO will state that they don’t penalize an OOS student during admissions. And they don’t…but…
UF does consider (as part of the holistic admission process), geographical residence and to a lesser degree state residency. See table C7 in UF’s CDS information.
http://www.ir.ufl.edu/CDS/cds2014-2015.pdf
Think of it this way, if you’re in the top 25% of applications (by GPA and test scores), you would not need to depend on UF holistic admissions (Nonacademic elements, like EC’s) as much as someone who’s in the bottom 25%. It’s the bottom 25% (academically) of in-state students that may have an advantage over an OOS student with the same stats. If you’re in the bottom 25% of accepted students, UF likely accepted you due to your nonacademic performance.
For example, a first generation student from an under-represented area of Florida (geographical residence) would have an advantage over an OOS student with the same stats. It’s not that UF held being OOS against the student, it’s that the in-state student may have holistic advantages that are not available to the OOS student.
A lower income, first generation student who is OOS is likely not going to apply to UF, due to the OOS tuition cost (unless they have the stats to earn a merit/need based scholarship). For that reason, most of the lower income/first generation students who applied to UF would be in-state.
It’s for this reason I think an OOS student needs to be around the middle 50% of admitted student stats, to have a decent chance of being accepted. Less than that, and the holistic factors will start to lean more toward in-state students.
This and other factors lead to the small difference between in-state admit rates (48.7%) and OOS admit rates (42.5%).
Keep in mind that all of the above is my best guess, or, as the Shadow would say,
“Who knows what evil holistic ways lurks in the hearts of UF admissions officers?