<p>I sent the Admissions Office an update on my recent awards/activities, and I got a personalized message from my regional officer thanking me (with my name). Is this standard procedure? If so, that's really nice of them to take the time to do that. </p>
<p>This could reflect the different styles of various admissions officers rather than any differences in possibilities of acceptance. Some adcoms make a point of a personal note and others do not. My son never received a personal answer from his rep at U Chicago despite several e-mails. Other students did. However, he was the one admitted EA.</p>
<p>I never received any notification either when I sent in update materials. I know several admissions officers that I know will make it a point to send a notification letter, but I know several that just won't.</p>
<p>Honestly who fooking cares? You're being very pedantic. Why not just wait for the resposne rather than effectively try to read tea leaves? Not long now!</p>
<p>Meh. I'm not gonna worry about. If this many people didn't hear from them, I'm sure it's just that some people don't spend the time to notify the applicants. Anyway, admissions decisions are supposedly being wrapped up today, so nothing we can do about it now!</p>
<p>I don't actually think it takes 9 days to mail decisions. But rather, the 9 days allows the admissions officers to re-argue for applicants they particularly want before the Committee.</p>
<p>The only reason why they release it on the 30th is because of the agreement they have with the other ivies - not because it takes that long to mail. What happens over those nine days though...we can only speculate</p>
<p>What happens over the nine days is the discussion of "borderline" cases. Borderline cases that were admitted now rejected, who were rejected now admitted, waitlisted, etc.</p>
<p>that's not fair. how come i never got a response. i sent a lot of update too. maybe they never received them. who did you address to? i addressed plainly, to "board of admissions". was that incorrect? </p>