<p>
[quote]
It doesn't matter if the full cost is $50,000 or $200,000; the parents still can only afford so much money. It's simple for parents, but they don't want to do it: just say how much they can spend per child.
[/quote]
Well, parents can do what I did and tell my kid a low-end figure. Psychologically it's easiest that way. But it isn't really the most open way --so even though it is how I approach things, I can't fault a parent who adapts a more flexible, wait-and-see approach. </p>
<p>But the reality is that it is NOT a situation of parents can only afford so much, except for parents who are very low-end in terms of income. For those of us who are middle-class with secure jobs, good credit, & a modest amount saved toward retirement, plus enough in savings to weather an emergency -- there is a range. The range is from a level that is fairly easy to one that is difficult and involves some sacrifice and realigning of goals & priorities. On the sacrifice end it might involve parents taking on debt or postponing retirement, or giving up on something else they wanted to do. </p>
<p>1Down's post says it all -- there is a price point related to perceived value. A parent may be willing to make considerable sacrifices to send their kid to Princeton; but they may not be willing to make the same sacrifices for a college that they perceive offers a lesser quality of education. It's not that they won't pay or won't pay more -- it's just that they won't pay as much more. So it's very possible that CareBear's parents would have been willing to pay for UCLA at $25K, but not at $34K. </p>
<p>That is their choice to make. And as noted, it is choice made based on knowing all the alternatives. The fact that CB has been admitted to an Honors program at the in-state u. is just an additional factor. It isn't a matter of going for the cheapest - its a matter of choosing what seemes to offer the best value among the available choices. </p>
<p>We make these sorts of choices all the time. I know that kids want to be in control of the process and it is my preference as a parent to give my kids as much control and leeway as possible. But there are times when my judgment is going to be the final deciding factor, and certainly if there is a significant sum of my money involved, I'm going to have the final word. </p>
<p>I know that CB came here to vent -- and I think that's fine -- but what really should happen is that CB should sit down with her parents for a rational conversation. Instead of ranting about the unfairness of it all, it would be better for CB to look seriously at her choices. If there is something that UCLA offers and her in-state college does not, then she needs to be able to make the case to her parents by showing them what that is. If there are objective criteria she can articulate, then maybe she can convince her parents - or maybe they can come to an understanding as to how much the parents will have to finance and how much extra CB will need to come up with on her own. </p>
<p>And if she isn't able to make a strong argument based on objective facts, then I think CB should re-evaluate. All things being equal, it's fine to choose a college based on subjective impressions or gut level feel. But all things aren't equal in this case. CB's parents are looking at a huge price differential between two colleges that, in their eyes, are not that different qualitatively.</p>