<p>Lobgent, my reply is long; some of it is also written for the benefit of others reading through for tips; and you're smart enough to distinguish what's only for you. </p>
<p>I apologize in advance-- am rushing here, so it's disorganized and long.No time to edit, am just pushing "send". Hope you and others can wade through it and benefit!</p>
<p>When I first read your essay, I immediately noticed how short the Pip para was, but before hastily assuming that it wasn't good enough, reread it twice. I decided that you proved to my satisfaction your thesis, that Pip's success had been disastrous for him, corrupting his innocence, adn that your details prior to the final sentence of that Pip para gave me enough to support the final sentence of that para. More detail might have been nice, but you proved your point succinctly, efficiently. I've listened to debaters and had to score them, and heard lawyers give very brief summations that win the case because the cover every point required. Sometimes it's important to recognize when a battle has been won. </p>
<p>I also know, realistically, that readers have thousands of these and might not take the time to reread you shorter Pip to ensure it "nailed the point." So another scorer might have "measured" the size of your Pip para (not literally, but y'know, metaphorically) and quickly assumed it "couldn't" be complete because of its brevity. Not so, but I could see another scorer therefore giving you a 10 over
exactly what YOU knew inside was the only real flaw in this essay. (Reflective, self-aware writer...now you see what I believe in your ability.)</p>
<p>I often find that the students who are the highest to the upper bar are always the ones who want to know how to improve, while those in need of improvement struggle to perceive what's wrong. Both require a teacher's care, attention and guidance. You're in the first category, however. </p>
<p>For that reason, and because you have no concerns re: style or word usage, I'd simply practice writing under timed conditions, so that you begin to get the sense of when your 25 minutes is starting to disappear. Pace yourself; more importantly, learn what is the pace that works for YOU within 25 minutes.</p>
<p>If it were me, I'd need this pace (USER WARNING, The pacing below is just my personal estimate, not a cookbook or recipe. Develop your own, but at least see the distribution of time. You'll go crazy timing yourself as you write, but just learn to glance at a watch (lay it down on the exam table) as you work, so you don't get stuck stuck stuck somewhere when it's better to move along.</p>
<p>REPEAT: NOT a recipe, just my approach; minutes are APPROXIMATE!!:</p>
<pre><code> 3-5 min. to ponder, jot and pen my thesis;
1-2 min to ponder and jotnote 2-3 examples. Keep the 3rd example optional, in your mind, since you might not have time to tackle it. It could also serve as an alternate in case you don't like how 1 of them is unfolding...but above all, don't spend tons of time thinking of 3 examples, when 2 goodies will make a fine essay.
</code></pre>
<p>As you choose an example, be aware of WHY you're choosing it, what it proves about your thesis, how it connects. You did that very well in your two selections. That is the magical "thinking moment" that is the basis of critical thought within your essay, that elevates it from a 10 up to 12. You do it so naturally that I think you take it for granted in your own work.</p>
<p>Anyway, the "Why" I chose that example, or didfferently said, What the example proves about my thesis, is what helps tie it back to your thesis when you are actually writing. Then it's not just a flat, sparkless description of the example (where many writers on this site stop and i'm trying to urge them beyond it). </p>
<p>JOt notes are not necessary if you're that intuitive and can "think as you write." Most can't, many say they can (lazy) but a very few can actually write that way. If that's your working style, I don't want to wreck what's successful by saying you "must" do jot notes! Whatever produced the above text -- outlined or not outlined--is what you should maintain, since it sounds great.</p>
<p>anyway, sorry to digress; i am getting interrupted here at home,typing fast as I can.</p>
<p>30 sec for jot notes (if you need that step) re: each example </p>
<p>4 min apiece to write each example</p>
<p>1-2 min to write the conclusion (if you've done a good essay, it shouldn't take much time at all to pen the conclusion; just restate the thesis in new words or images; if possible: a clever way but only if it comes to you intuitively at that moment. Otherwise, just wrap it up logically, nicely, clearly for the reader.</p>
<p>Then, with any remaining time, go back to the body of the text. </p>
<p>Now, the next para of advice here is more for others reading this to learn, b/c I think you already have great choice of words, but for others I'd say: As you re-read, if you can quickly upgrade a few vocabulary words or twist a few dull phrases into more clever ones, do so. It'll add sparkle and life to your writing style. If you see the word "get" there's likely a better verb to replace it with, for example. </p>
<p>Or...lobgent, as an example, even good writers can always tweak a bit. I just reread my text above quickly and changed the word to "elevate" (originally I had the word "bring"). Whate4ver you can improve quickly in a moment, do. There's no ceiling on this. Just continue to use words that you fully understand. You did not put in a fake new word there that you barely understood, so it was misused or poorly nuanced. Stay with that honesty, but pull in your best-known vocabulary to make your writing sparkle. It already does, I'm just talking about continue on a good path. I always do this, as much as time allows. (which at tjhe moment I'm chasing a clock so I hate this particular piece I'm writing now; blaaaah, hasty. )</p>
<p>Also simultaneously, check as you reread the whole essay (at the end of your work time) for grammar errors; fix them with a quick cross-out. I find when I write in a hurry my worst demons are subject-verb agreement errors and possessives (it's) even though I know them thoroughly when I don't have to write timed. </p>
<p>In ohter words, for you I'd say just practice 25-minute timed tests so that you distribute your pace better. That would have given you more time to distribute to write about Pip. </p>
<p>I liked that your essay had two developed (well, you feel one developed and one semi-developed) examples rather than 3.</p>
<p>The more I read these essays. the more I think that it's too hard to write about 3 well in only 25 MINUTES! If you have little to say about each example but more to say about the connections among the 3 edamples, that'd be the only reason I can see to venture into 3 examples. </p>
<p>P.S. To share a personal belief, I find it appalling that you students are required to write such logical constructs under timed circumstances. Unless everyone is supposed to grow up and become a lawyer-working-under-time-allotted-minutes-to-submit-to-the-judge (huff, puff), </p>
<p>I think this is a bad combination of requests for students. Either give you 25 minutes to write creatively and beautifully, poetically... or give you as much time as you need to gather your thoughts and write a logical piece. This combination SUCKS (do grownups say that word?) </p>
<p>But, it';s their system and I want students to do well with it. So I'm helping you all here, but understand that I don't agree that this is a good approach to writing. It's just an appraoch to TESTING writing. IMHO.</p>