<p>i went through 6 practice tests from PR's 11 practice tests for the new sat&psat.
here are my math results (54 questions per test):</p>
<p>got
0 wrong: 2 practice tests
1 wrong: 1 practice test
2 wron: 2 practice tests
3 wrong: 1 practice test</p>
<p>i missed 2-3 questions per section (for a total of 6-9 questions) on barrons practice tests.
not very consistent here.......</p>
<p>should i stick with pr's 11 practice tests?</p>
<p>I used princeton review to prepare for the SAT1, and it felt about the same in terms of difficulty as the real test. </p>
<p>Its just that the math section in the SAT1 really is a joke.</p>
<p>Try the blue book and see if you get the same results.</p>
<p>I've used PR and Kaplan--I think PR is actually more difficult than SAT math (believe it or not), and Kaplan seemed to be easier. This is what I gathered after testing on both practice tests consistently. Sometimes PR seems to test things that I've never seen on the SAT.</p>
<p>I found PR 11 to be great practice, though.</p>
<p>PR math practice is good IMO. I don't think it's easier. A bit harder if anything.</p>
<p>What's the predicted score when you miss 1, 2, 3 questions on math?</p>
<p>i think it's 790/80/70</p>
<p>Missing 3 is usually lowish 700s, missing 2 should be middle to high, and missing one should be high. I missed 5 raw points (like missing 4) and got a 720, and missed 1 for a 780.</p>
<p>I hate the curve...it's sooo harsh!</p>
<p>I'm doing Barron's Math Workbook and I'm missing like 12 for a full math practice test. I plan to do the math tests from the BlueBook, the online course, and maybe PR 11...if I'm not tired by then. </p>
<p>Can I expect to get into the 700s with mucho practice? I hope so</p>