I’m a sophomore and I am planning on running for VP of Technology in my FBLA chapter. Next year, when I’m a junior, I will run for President.
In college admissions is there really a big difference in being President as a junior and being President as a senior??
I’m asking this because of a really unfair situation that happened yesterday. One of the club advisors approached my friend and told him that he should run for President. He’s not even qualified to be President; he only joined FBLA this year, barely goes to any meetings, and didn’t qualify for state in his event (so he had to switch events). He wasn’t even considering running for FBLA exec board until the club advisor approached him.
On the other hand, I’ve been in the club during my freshman and sophomore years. Last year, I placed third at state in my event and qualified for Nationals. I’ve gone to almost every single meeting and have even helped fundraise for the club.
I don’t know, I just find it to be really unfair considering how he has less experience and success in the club and barely knows anything about FBLA, yet he was still asked by a club advisor to run for PRESIDENT.
And asides from all the unfairness, I don’t think he’s fit to be president. He’s told me how he’s cheated multiple times in one of his classes. He barely has any time for anything besides academics and another one of his extracurriculars (I can’t say what it is, but he often spends nearly all his time after school doing it).
He’s not even passionate about FBLA, and has already made up his mind to attend film school.
This year, the club advisors decided to give more power to themselves and the exec board in the voting process for next year’s exec board. If the club advisor picked him to be President, then he’ll obviously just become President.
I don’t know if I’m being too dramatic about this. It just seems incredibly unfair to me (and reaaally sucks), but I guess life is unfair, so I’ll have to get over it.