<p>alrite, I just took the practice exam for bio on it and I got like 5 wrong 2 blank and got a raw score of 73 which equaled out to like 750...</p>
<p>but how accurate is that conversion becaue a lot of my friends got 800s and said the test was easy but if you can only get 2-3 wrong then just one stupid mis bubble or just one question you just dont know will stop that sweet 800...</p>
<p>PR is a tad bit harder than the real test.
does anyone know what a 730 on Barron translate to in CB terms?</p>
<p>lol dude, i got a 700-720 on Barron's. So estatic.</p>
<p>princeton review is not very realistic. ok, well, some are, but most aren't. barrons's info is good but the questions are weird. i scored around the low 700s in princeton review but ended up with 800 in real life. </p>
<p>i also took sat bio class w/pr. they gave me some practice tests. the questions were very tricky and some were definitely ambiguous. i got 590 on my first. even my pr teacher said that some questions like that wont appear on the real test, and they didnt:)</p>
<p>good luck, btw, i took e, and there are usually more tricks on e.</p>
<p>You actually went to PR IMO. anyway... I would just keep taking tests and mem things I got wrong. Sorry can't help you really. </p>
<p>I was averaging 740-60 on practice tests... real life 730, but then again I crammed teh wrong material ::whistle::</p>
<p>I think I got a 760 on a PR once.</p>
<p>i got 770 on the sparknotes test.. not that much credibility but i still got 800 on bio -e...</p>
<p>sparknotes for the win!</p>