<p>^I think so. That’s another reason why “If they would have been told” is incorrect, in my opinion.</p>
<p>^
I think the question was like:</p>
<p>Were they to be told that the defendant had a previous charge on his record, there was no way they would be able to conduct the case without bias.</p>
<p>It sort of seems like they’re currently conducting the case, and so they didn’t know at that point…</p>
<p>But the if/then combo was my justification for picking A.</p>
<p>^ It was definetely A (“Were they to be told…”). I eliminated all the choices but A/B and B is incorrect because there would have needed to be a “they would have been…” in the second part of the sentence for the conditional tense in the first part to work.</p>
<p>Were there any other tricky ones besides the three that have been stressed on in this thread?</p>
<p>I don’t understand the debate on the pyramid one, the tense seemed clearly wrong.</p>
<p>Hey for the paragraphs thing
Was it “on the other hand” or "it turned out:</p>
<p>^
I put “However”…</p>
<p>bump 10char</p>
<p>so how many no errors were there?</p>
<p>^ Three: the second question in that section (I forgot what it was talking about), the Eleanor Roosevelt question and the Japanese actress one.</p>
<p>wasnt there one near the end?</p>
<p>was insure/ensure near the end?</p>
<p>The very last sentence about Egypt had a tense error in it and the insure one had a diction error so neither were “No Errors”.</p>
<p>so the insure/ensure was near the end?</p>
<p>I got the Egypt one right.</p>
<p>i think i put another no error on the one before the egypt question?</p>
<p>this question looks familiar, what do u guys think of it:</p>
<p>and one with the reporter… like if her boss didnt check something
she would have written? and ran the story? i dont know. please help me<br>
Reply </p>
<p>11-03-2007, 07:55 PM #97<br>
art_star
Member</p>
<p>Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 819 I think i put No Error for the reporter thing.</p>
<p>For the sentence completion regarding the scientist’s experiment and lack of funding…was it curtailed or eradicated? i put eradicate but now that i think of it, curtail seems better. sigh! </p>
<p>posts 94 and 95 on that november link</p>
<p>^It’s been established that a lot of the Form W PSAT came from the November 2007 SAT.</p>
<p>no i meant what did you put on that question</p>
<p>also was this question near the end or beginning of the idenfiying sentence errors on the test</p>
<p>We really can’t assume which questions had “no error.” Apparently, none of us actually remember how the sentence was written exactly, and we do not know how ETS will answer each question. Do not assume that people who say there are “three errors” like ACT Tester, are correct.</p>
<p>The Egypt question was the last ID Error question; insure/ensure was second to last. The scientist curtailing/eradicating funds was a CR question. I don’t remember any questions on the ID Error section about a reporter running a story without showing her boss.</p>
<p>For what it’s worth, I also got 3 No Errors (on the same 3 ACTTester mentioned: Eleanor Roosevelt, the Japanese voice-over actress, and one about how one needs to be able to know when to take criticism in order to better himself at (I think) debating).</p>
<p>If anyone still cares, I emailed ETS about the Japanese actress question and received a response today. In short, the answer is E, no error. If you’re curious as to why, let me know and I’ll type their reasoning out. Condolences to everyone who put A.</p>
<p>^Noooooo :(</p>
<p>How long’d it take you to get a response? I think I might email them about a few other questions :D</p>
<p>I emailed them October 15.</p>