<p>I don't want to bore you guys with my overall curriculum so let's go straight to the question: are 720 in french and 750 in spanish good enough for this University? </p>
<p>Cheers guys </p>
<p>PS. i will also take biology</p>
<p>SIgh… better be haha because I only got a 700 on both those tests…</p>
<p>yeah, those scores are probably good enough, so no worries</p>
<p>im also a fan of the nerazzurri…shame they lost to man u :(</p>
<p>yeah you’re right pollocampero6060…but i think that overall we deserved to go through…adri and ibra were really unlucky…no matter…with Diego ( werder) and Milito ( Genoa) we’ll do much better next year…thanks for your replies!</p>
<p>JHU doesn’t look at SAT IIs…</p>
<p>SAT II’s are recommended especially for engineering majors (very recommended for BME).
They won’t count against you but its not required to have it.</p>
<p>yes…</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>That is absolutely not true. Though we do not require SAT II subject exams, we do highly recommend them, and when submit they are absolutely something we evaluate. </p>
<p>However, it seems the original poster thinks that only SAT II subject exam scores will influence an admissions decision and that couldn’t be further from the way it actually works. Subject exam scores are one of the many factors we review in our holistic application review approach.</p>
<p>How much more important are SAT I’s than SAT II’s?</p>
<p>i could be very, very horribly wrong, but here is my take on it: IMO, SAT I’s are not used as a standard chart upon which to compare students. If i am an admissions worker and i see a girl from the middle of nowhere alabama at a sub par public school who gets a 700 on CR and WR, i deem that as noteworthy. On the other side, if i see a NJ private school kid with the same numbers, i just move on. in that same fashion, i would take note of SAT I’s that are extremely high and extremely low, like 800’s and 500’s, but would not use them as a deciding factor.</p>
<p>as far as SAT II’s are concerned, i would look at it in the context of classes taken and scores achieved on SAT I’s. For instance, if the student is big on math and physics i look for them to have taken those two subject tests and to have done well in them (meaning around 700 or above.) if not, i would ask myself why? But, if i find a student who is strong in math and science but struggled on the SAT I, i would not be shocked to find weaker subject test scores as the candidate may have problems with standardized tests. also, if someone studies the IB i expect their curriculum to match up less with sat science subject tests than AP course loads, for instance and take that into account.</p>
<p>basically, my thoughts are (and these are just my own opinions mind you) that the SATs should be seen as a factor to consider that gives context to the application…nothing more or less. but maybe that’s me just dreaming. lolz!</p>