<p>The thesis and conclusion aren’t even connected because they are adding in superfluous information that sounds abrupt. It isn’t a clash of logic so much as a clash that sets up an abrupt conclusion.</p>
<p>Again, the question asked about the specific conclusion in that sentence, not what the passage as a whole said. Look at that sentence alone. Then ask yourself if the mentioning of hormones as a growth factor has no effect on that sentence.</p>
<p>I started with passage 2, then worked from there and went back to passage 1 at the end. I had enough time and didn’t think it was terribly hard. Also, why are people asking answers on here? The people on here don’t know for sure if they even have the right answer. We can argue till we’re blue in the face but we still won’t know for sure.</p>
<p>I bet you all did fine. I just hope I did too. Don’t fret about it so much everyone.</p>
<p>I’ll simplify this:
“He appeared to be frustrated from the ACT test”
“In addition, his girlfriend had just broken up with him, causing further frustration.”
Does the second part weaken the first? Do they contradict each other?</p>
<p>after reading this, i feel so much better. i thought i answered so many wrong on reading!! i usually score around a 32 in reading, and today i thought a 20 was coming my way!</p>
<p>i don’t even know what the first story was about. </p>
<p>I’m pretty ****ed. I spent about 50% of the time on the first passage and had to the last passage and 8 questions in 5 minutes and it was definitely the easiest passage… And I probably got like several wrong on both while wasting equally as much time.</p>
<p>I agree with Jamesford and The Government. They’re both really smart (if you look at other threads) and usually get the right answers. </p>
<p>I also chose that the hormones weakened the argument…The WHOLE passage was about how climate and elevation affect the mane…then he randomly throws at the end…“oh yea hormones also have an effect…” my reaction…“umm okay…you made the climate and elevation thing sound so intense…and you kind of took away from the whole point of your piece by mentioning hormones”</p>